SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 1034

Shaji – Appellant
Versus
Sharmina – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. P.V.Anoop, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Sri. Zubair Pulikkool, Advocate.

ORDER :

C.S.Dias, J.

The revision petition is filed questioning the legality and correctness of the order in M.C.No.91/2016 of the Family Court Vatakara, ordering the revision petitioner to pay monthly maintenance allowance @ Rs.4,000/- each to the respondents - his divorced wife and two children - from the date of order. The revision petitioner was the respondent and the respondents were the petitioners before the Family Court.

Brief facts

2. The respondents had filed the application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('Code', for brevity) against the revision petitioner seeking monthly maintenance allowance. It was the case of the respondents that the 1st respondent is the divorced wife of the revision petitioner and the respondents 2 and 3 are the children born in their wedlock. Due to the matrimonial cruelty meted out on the 1st respondent by the revision petitioner, the respondents had to flee the matrimonial home and seek shelter in the paternal home of the 1st respondent. The revision petitioner was employed abroad in a supermarket as a Salesman and was earning a monthly income equivalent to Rs.50,000/-. Despite having sufficient means, the revision petitioner w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top