SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2325

SANDEEP MEHTA, RAMESHWAR VYAS
Khursida – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Salim – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Abhinav Jain, for the Appellant; Mr. Ranjeet Joshi, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. The matter comes on an application (Inward No. 01/2021) filed by the petitioner seeking early hearing of the revision petition.

2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.

3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing today itself.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the main revision petition and perused the order impugned.

5. The present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against the Order dated 11.06.2008 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Udaipur in Criminal Case No. 431/2004 whereby while allowing the application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. filed by the respondent-husband, the Order dated 06.08.1999 awarding monthly allowance of maintenance in favour of the petitioner-wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was modified holding that she would not be entitled for any maintenance from the respondent-husband from the date of passing of the Order dated 11.06.2008, whereas, the application seeking enhancement of maintenance under Section 127 Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner-wife was dismissed.

6. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner-wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top