IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J.
Divya K.S., D/o. Soman K. Nair and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Its Hon’ble Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Kerala and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No. 37369 Of 2024
Decided On : 19-12-2024
(A) Constitution of India - Fundamental Rights - Government Order dated 11.07.2024 - Compulsory Bonded Service for M.Sc. Nursing Course students challenged as arbitrary and illegal - Petitioners argued no bond executed, thus not bound by the provision - Court ruled that petitioners were aware of potential compulsory service upon admission, thus lawful. (Paras 13, 16, 21)
(B) Compulsory Bond - Legality of imposition considered - Previous judgments upheld the State's authority to enforce bonded service for educational benefits - Court found no violation of individual rights, as conditions were accepted knowingly. (Paras 18, 22)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners, M.Sc. Nursing Degree students, challenged the legality of Ext.P1 Government Order imposing compulsory bonded service, arguing lack of prior notice and execution of bond. They sought higher stipends in comparison to their previous earnings. (Paras 1-6)
Findings of Court:
The State's decision to implement compulsory bonded service was based on maintaining educational standards and teacher-student ratios, deemed not arbitrary or illegal. (Paras 21, 22)
Issues: Whether the compulsory bonded service is legally sustainable and if the petitioners are bound by it despite not executing a bond. (Paras 13, 16)
Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that petitioners, having accepted the terms of admission, are bound by the conditions set forth, and the compulsory service is justified in the context of public policy and educational requirements. (Paras 21, 22)
Result: Writ petition disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
(N. Nagaresh, J.)
The petitioners are M.Sc. Nursing Degree Course students under the academic batches 2022-2024 and 20232025. They are currently pursuing their Post Graduate Degree Course. They have approached this Court seeking to quash Ext.P1 Notification issued by respondents 1 and 2 and to direct the 2nd respondent to allow the petitioners’ request to make the compulsory bonded service optional. The petitioners also seek to direct the 1st respondent to systematically raise the stipend for the compulsory service in a decent manner in comparison to the salaries paid to the Assistant Professors with the same qualification as of the petitioners.
2. The petitioners state that M.Sc. Nursing Course is a Two Year Degree Course having examinations on yearly basis for two academic years. The 7th respondent-University has the authority to lay syllabus in the matter of academics, training period and award of Certificates. The 9th respondent-Indian Nursing Council oversees the standards of education, registration and working environment of nurses in the country.
3. Government of Kerala published Ext.P1 Government Order dated 11.07.2024. In Ext.P1, it has been stated that Compulsory Service will be optional to the students admitted for M.Sc. Nursing Course in Government Colleges of Nursing. If Government desires to implement Compulsory Service, every student is bound to do the same. The petitioners are challenging the above provision.
4. The petitioners state that few of the students from the Government Nursing Colleges of Kannur and Kottayam addressing their difficulties relating to this Bonded Service submitted Ext.P5 representation to the 3rd respondent. The petitioners state that they were made to sign a bond attached as Annexure-II along with respective Prospectus of the years 2023 and 2024. The bond executed was relating to the completion of the course without violating Rules and Regulations and was not related to any complusory bonded service. The petitioners put up the issue to their official association also, as can be seen from Ext.P8.
5. The petitioners, who graduated four year B.Sc. Nursing Degree Course and had been working in different hospitals, were drawing salary at the range from Rs.30,000/-to Rs.50,000/-. They are mostly middle aged women and men, married, with kids and living separated from their family, staying in College Hostels. The M.Sc. Nursing Degree academics require sleepless hours, four hours of classes and eight hours of hospital service, six days per week, without vacation or leave.
6. The petitioners joined the course with an intention to accelerate their career prospectives and to improve their family standard of living by joining high paying jobs in India or in Hospitals abroad. Ext.P1 imposing Bonded Service is highly arbitrary and illegal, contended the petitioners. The counsel for the petitioners pointed out that Ext.P1 Government Order was issued on 11.07.2024. The petitioners had joined the Course earlier to that. Therefore, Ext.P1 cannot be made applicable to the petitioners.
7. The enforcement of the Bonded System is without any prior notice and without even providing any information before hand to the petitioners. Though the Prospectus gave power to the Government to implement bonded service system, the Prospectus did not provide as to the length of the bonded service or as to the honorarium or the allowances to be paid during the bonded service. In fact, the petitioners have not executed any bond. As long as the petitioners have not executed bond, they cannot be forced merely on the basis of a condition in the Prospectus. Ext.P1 is therefore highly arbitrary and is liable to be quashed, contended the petitioners.
8. The 2nd respondent filed a counter affidavit. The 2nd respondent submitted that it was clearly stipulated in the Prospectus that if the Government desires to implement Compulsory Service, every student is bound to do the same. The Government has decided to make applicable
Aiysha Beegum (Dr.) and others v. State of Kerala and others
AI
The court upheld the legality of compulsory bonded service for nursing students, affirming that conditions accepted upon admission are binding and align with public policy.
The court ruled that the imposition of a compulsory service bond on M.Sc Nursing students post-enrollment was arbitrary and violated the principle of legal certainty.
The court upheld the validity of state-mandated compulsory service bonds for medical postgraduates, affirming they serve public interest and do not violate constitutional rights.
Point of Law - Right to life guaranteed by Article 21 means right to life with human dignity. Communitarian dignity has been recognised by this Court. While balancing communitarian dignity vis-à-vis ....
The condition of mandatory service of four/five years as provided in Clauses 6.1 and 11.1.2 of the 2019 Policy is unreasonable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.