IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.Muhamed Mustaque, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ.
Divya.K.S D/o Soman K. Nair - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Kerala Represented By Its Hon’ble Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Kerala, Govt. Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram - Respondent
WA NO. 158 OF 2025
Decided On : 29-01-2025
JUDGMENT :
A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.
This writ appeal was filed by some students who enrolled in the M.Sc Nursing Degree Course at various Government Nursing Colleges in the State during the academic year 2022-23 and 2023-24. They challenged a Government Order dated 11.07.2024 in the writ petition, which mandated a compulsory one-year teaching internship upon the execution of a bond. By the said order, the Government decided to engage students who enrolled from the academic year 2022–23 onwards and successfully completed the M.Sc. Nursing course as bonded lecturers, with a stipend of Rs.25,000/-. According to them, this is a violation of the Indian Nursing Council directives.
2. It is appropriate to refer to the relevant portion of the guidelines issued by the Indian Nursing Council regarding bond system for the M.Sc. Nursing programme, which state as follows:
Taking service bonds from students and forcefully retaining their Original Certificates is viewed as an unethical practice by the Indian Nursing Council. If any such practice comes to the notice of the Indian Nursing Council, appropriate action under Section 14 of the Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947 will be taken against the erring institution.”
3. The learned Single Judge was not persuaded by the argument of the writ petitioners and, taking note of the judgment of the Apex Court in Association of Medical Super Speciality Aspirants and Residents and Ors. v. Union of India and Others [(2019) 8 SCC 607] and the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Aiysha Beegum(Dr.) and others v. State of Kerala and others [2018 (2) KLT 471], repelled the challenge. The impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge is challenged in this appeal by some of the writ petitioners.
4. We note that the instructions of the Nursing Council regarding the bond system were explained by the Nursing Council in the counter affidavit filed by them before this Court. It is stated by them that these guidelines were issued to stop the practice of some nursing institutions forcefully engaging students to work as nurses in the hospital by retaining their original certificates. We also note that various High Courts have considered the legality of the bonded service; and the Apex Court in the Association of Medical Super Speciality Aspirants and Residents case (supra) declared that such compulsory bonds in Government institutions are not in violation of any law in force.
5. However, we note that the Government in this matter neither insisted on the execution of the bond at the time of enrolment nor asked the students to execute such bonds within a reasonable time.
6. M.Sc Nursing is a two-year programme. There are two groups of students before us: those enrolled in the academic year 2022–23 and those enrolled in the academic year 2023–24. In regard to the students of 2022-23 batch, they completed their course in the month of November, 2024.
7. The prospectus for admission to Post Graduate Degree 2022 was issued only on 21/7/2022. It is stipulated in the prospectus regarding compulsory service as follows:
A similar prospectus was also issued for the academic year 2023-24 on 30/5/2023. The stipulation about compulsory service is the same. The Government was not sure if compulsory service should be insisted on students at the time of the issuance of the prospectus. The Government kept the option alive to insist on students to execute bonds for compulsory service. Is it possible for the Government to leave any room for uncertainty regarding the students’ future? We do not doubt the legality of insisting on compulsory bond. Every legal relationship, in whatever sphere, is constituted by legal certainty. Legal certainty is the aspect of the rule of law. That means one shoul
AI
The court ruled that the imposition of a compulsory service bond on M.Sc Nursing students post-enrollment was arbitrary and violated the principle of legal certainty.
The court upheld the legality of compulsory bonded service for nursing students, affirming that conditions accepted upon admission are binding and align with public policy.
The court upheld the validity of state-mandated compulsory service bonds for medical postgraduates, affirming they serve public interest and do not violate constitutional rights.
Point of Law - Right to life guaranteed by Article 21 means right to life with human dignity. Communitarian dignity has been recognised by this Court. While balancing communitarian dignity vis-à-vis ....
Executing bonds for post-graduate medical service requires adherence to conditions specified without exceptions for pandemic duties, reaffirming contractual obligations under Article 19(1)(g).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.