IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
Rahul, S/o. Revi – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, (Through The Sub Inspector Of Police), Pandalam Police Station – Respondent
Crl.MC No. 6099 Of 2017
Decided On : 09-09-2024
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 306 - Abetment of suicide - The petitioner sought to quash the final report alleging abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC after the deceased committed suicide due to love failure - The court found no nexus between the accused's conduct and the suicide, emphasizing that mere emotional distress does not constitute abetment - The court referenced previous rulings to clarify the necessary intent and actions to establish abetment under Section 306 IPC. (Paras 10, 17, 18)
(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Quashing of proceedings - The court held that if the allegations do not prima facie constitute an offence, the proceedings can be quashed under inherent powers. (Paras 22, 8)
ORDER :
(P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J.)
This Criminal Miscellaneous case is filed to quash Annexure-A2 final report in Crime No. 2308/2016 of Pandalam Police Station, which is presently numbered as CP No. 22/2017 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Adoor. Now, the case is pending before the Addl. Sessions Court-II, Pathanamthitta as SC No. 257/2018. The offence alleged is under Sec. 306 IPC.
2. One Rehana committed suicide on 04.11.2016 between 8 am and 5.30 pm at her house. The cause of death was stated to be death by hanging. The allegation is that the petitioner and the deceased were in love and on examination of the personal diary of the deceased and whatsapp messages of the victim, the police alleged that the accused abetted her to commit suicide. Thus, it is alleged that the accused committed offence under Sec.306 IPC. According to the petitioner, even if the entire allegations are accepted, no offence under Sec.306 IPC is made out.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated the contentions and also relied the order passed by this Court in Crl.M.C. No.4161/2015 and submitted that even if the entire allegations are accepted, no offence is made out. The Public Prosecutor made available the case diary in the case and submitted that the entries of the deceased in the diary will show that there is abetment from the side of the petitioner.
5. This Court considered the contentions of the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor. This Court also perused the case diary including the entries in the diary maintained by the deceased. The allegation in the final report is like this :
6. Admittedly, the petitioner and the deceased were in love. It is true that there is some entry in the diary to the effect that the reason for the suicide is the love failure with the petitioner. Whether the same will attract the offence under Sec.306 IPC is the question to be decided. This Court considered the ingredients of Sec.306 IPC in detail in the order dated 06.08.2024 in Crl.M.C. No. 4161/2015. The relevant portion of the above judgment is extracted hereunder :
107: who— A person abets the doing of a thing, First.—Instigates any person to do that thing; or Secondly.—Engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or Thirdly.— Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing. Explanation I: A person who, by willful misrepresentation, or by willful concealment of a material fact which he is bound to disclose, voluntarily causes or procures, or attempts to cause or procure, a thing to be done, is said to instigate the doing of that thing.’
10. Unless there is ‘abetment’ as stated in Section 107 IPC, there cannot be any conviction under Section 306 IPC. The prosecution case in this case is that there was a love affair between the petitioner and the deceased girl. There were several communications between the petitioner and the deceased. Subsequently, when the deceased called the petitioner over phone before her death, he informed that he is in friendship with another girl and he will not be able to
Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Harikrishnan and Another v. State of Kerala and Another
Netai Dutta v. State of W.B., 2005 KHC 427, 2005 (2) SCC 659, AIR 2005 SC 1775, 2005 SCC (Cri) 543
Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh
S.S. Chheena v. Vijay Kumar Mahajan
Sanju alias Sanjay Singh Sengar v. State of Madhya Pradesh
To establish abetment under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear intent and direct actions by the accused that compel the victim to commit suicide; emotional distress alone is insufficient.
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of the accused's intention to instigate the suicide, which was absent in this case.
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be direct acts of incitement closely linked to the suicide, and mere denial of marriage does not constitute abetment.
To establish abetment of suicide under IPC Section 306, there must be clear evidence of instigation or a direct act by the accused that leads the victim to take their life.
Legal proceedings alone, without direct instigation or proximity, do not amount to abetment of suicide under Sections 306 and 107 IPC.
To establish abetment of suicide under IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or aiding, which was absent in this case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to establish a clear mens rea and active act to push the deceased into a position to commit suicide in cases of....
To convict for abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or active involvement by the accused, which was not established in this case.
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, evidence of instigation or encouragement by the accused is essential; mere emotional turmoil does not suffice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.