Back
NITIN JAMDAR, S. MANU
SUO MOTU JPP INITIATED BY THE HIGH COURT ERNAKULAM – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Nitin Jamdar, C. J.
This matter numbered as J.P.P. No.5 of 2024 is placed before us at the instance of the Registry under the Judicial Practice and Procedure roster.
2. In paragraph (1) of the petition, it is stated thus:-
1. In WP(C) No.32027/2024, order dated 07.10.2024 is as follows:
‘Post along with WP(C) 30131/2016 on 09.10.2024.’
x x x
2. In WP(C) 35935/2024, order dated 15.10.2024 directs as follows:
‘Post along with WP(C) Nos.34132/2024 and 16757/2023 on 17.10.2024.’
x x x
3. In WP(Crl.) 346/2023, order dated 27.09.2024 reads as follows:
‘Post this matter along with WP(Crl.) 858/2023 on 18.10.2024.’
x x x
4. In WP(C) 32752/2024 as per order dated 13.09.2024 direction is given as follows:
‘Post along with WP(C) No.27991/2024.’
x x x
5. In WP(C) 30479/2019, as per order dated 10.08.2023, it was ordered as follows:
‘Post along with connected case WP(C) 19328/2015’.
x x x
6. In WP(C) 34309/2024, as per order dated 08.10.2024 direction
Judicial orders must adhere to roster guidelines, and deviations without proper direction may result in disciplinary action.
The authority of the Chief Justice to issue administrative directives is absolute and such directives should align with established rules without requiring concurrence from the Full Court.
The court established that strict adherence to the roster system for case management is essential to ensure judicial efficiency and prevent confusion in the handling of related cases.
Registry officials cannot decide case listings independently, ensuring transparency and preventing unfair practices; authority lies with the Chief Justice for case postings.
The court established that the Registry must not independently decide case listings and must follow administrative protocols for clarity and transparency.
The court emphasized the necessity for related cases to be heard together to ensure judicial consistency and addressed discrepancies in case listing procedures.
Only individuals with legal standing can challenge administrative decisions, particularly regarding roster fixation and seniority disputes.
Judicial integrity must be maintained through consistency in orders, and manipulation of judicial records undermines the rule of law and public confidence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
