M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, DEEPAK ROSHAN
Sanjeev Bhatia, S/o Satinder Pal Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Jharkhand through Its Registrar General, Jharkhand High Court at Ranchi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)
1. Petitioners in this Writ petition are serving as District Judges in the State of Jharkhand and are direct recruits in a recruitment process which commenced in 2017 and who were appointed on 5.8.2019 and 6.8.2019.
2. The issue in the writ petition relates to fixation of roster inter-se between direct recruits and promotees of the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Services governed by the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, Appointment and Condition of Service) Rules, 2001.
3. Initially in 2004, through a notification dt. 20.08.2004, it was laid down that (i) 50% of posts of District Judges amongst Sub-Judges were to be filled by promotion on the basis of merit-cum-seniority and passing a suitability test, (ii) 25% were to be filled by promotion by way of selection strictly on the basis of merit through a limited competitive examination of Sub-Judges having not less than 5 years service and (iii) 25% were to be filled by direct recruitment from the Bar on the basis of a test and viva voce conducted by the High Court.
4. This was modified through a notification dt. 14.12.2011 in the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, App
K. Meghachandra Singh and others v. Ningam Siro and others
Dinesh Kumar Gupta v. High Court of Rajasthan
D. Ganesh Rao Patnaik and Others. vs. State of Jharkhand and Others
Only individuals with legal standing can challenge administrative decisions, particularly regarding roster fixation and seniority disputes.
Point of Law : In case ingredients for filing complaint under Section 138 of NI Act are in existence, then presumption is there, as provided under law, and to rebut the same, definitely, evidence wou....
Seniority inter-se direct recruits and promotee District Judges shall be determined on the basis of Roster.
(1) Appointment on Post of District Judge – When appellants have successfully qualified suitability test, they could not have been deprived of their legitimate right of promotion only on account of l....
Recruitment to Higher Judicial Services (Cadre of District Judges) will be on the basis of principle of “merit-cum-seniority” and passing a suitability test – While applying principle of “merit-cum-s....
(1) Incentive that was directed to be given to junior officers working as Civil Judges for promotion as District Judges solely on the basis of merit would be defeated if their seniority in cadre of D....
Vested rights from recruitment advertisements must be respected and seniority must be determined based on established rules in force at the time of recruitment, which cannot be altered retroactively ....
Seniority – Roster system is only for the purpose of ensuring that quantum of reservation is reflected in recruitment process – It has nothing to do with inter se seniority among those recruited – Ro....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.