SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 21

A. BADHARUDEEN
Aswin, S/o. Murali – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala Represented By Public Prosecutor,High Court Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : V.A.Johnson (Varikkappallil)
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor Sri T.S Jibu

ORDER :

This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (`BNSS’ for short) seeking quashment of Annexure-1 final report and proceedings pursuant thereto in S.C.No.305/2022 on the files of Fast Track Special Court, Alathur.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail. Perused the relevant documents, including Annexure-1 final report.

3. The prosecution case is that the accused herein was found in possession of child sexual exploitative and abuse material in his mobile phones used with BSNL and Airtel SIMs downloaded at 7.30 am on 04.10.2020 by the first witness. Accordingly, the same were recovered and crime was registered alleging commission of offences punishable under Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 15(1) r/w 2(1)(da) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (`POCSO Act’ for short). While seeking quashment of the proceedings on the submission that none of the offences is made out prima facie, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the ratio of the decision of this Court reported in [2024 LiveLaw Ker 376 :

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

Sebin Thomas VS State Of Kerala Represented By Public Prosecutor - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 569: No keywords or phrases indicating judicial treatment (e.g., followed, distinguished, criticized, questioned, overruled, reversed, abrogated) are present in the provided description. The entry only summarizes the central legal point established in the judgment, with no information on how it has been treated in subsequent decisions.

Sebin Thomas VS State Of Kerala Represented By Public Prosecutor - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 569: Treatment is unclear due to absence of any explicit indicators of judicial treatment in the provided case law description. Without such language, it cannot be objectively categorized into positive, negative, or other treatment patterns.

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top