SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 80

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
Rahul Rai S/o. Rajendra Rai - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 9150 OF 2024
Decided On : 13-01-2025

Advocates appeared:
FOR THE APPELLANT : BY ADVS. NIRMAL.S VEENA HARI
FOR THE RESPONDENT: BY ADVS. NAUSHAD K.A.-PP

IMPORTANT POINT
The court ruled that the total weight of narcotic mixtures must be considered for determining commercial quantity, and emphasized that bail is the rule, not the exception.

Headnote:

(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2(viia), 2(xxiiia), 22(c) - Bail application - Accused charged with possession of narcotic substances - Court determined that the quantities of seized substances did not constitute 'commercial quantity' as per statutory definitions - The court emphasized that the entire mixture must be considered when determining quantities, referencing prior case law. (Paras 9 , 10 , 11 , 15 , 17 ) (B) Bail - Principle of bail as a rule and jail as an exception - The court reiterated that bail should be granted unless there are compelling reasons to deny it, especially when the accused has no criminal antecedents and has been in custody for a significant period. (Paras 18 , 19 , 20 )

Facts of the case: The petitioner was arrested for possessing small quantities of Charas and Ganja, along with mushrooms containing Psilocybin. The petitioner argued that the total weight of the mushrooms did not meet the threshold for commercial quantity.

Findings of Court: The court found that the seized substances did not amount to a commercial quantity, allowing for bail under stringent conditions. Issues: The main issue was whether the seized mushrooms constituted a commercial quantity under the NDPS Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the entire mixture must be considered when determining the quantity of narcotic substances, and that mushrooms alone do not qualify as a narcotic drug.

Result: Bail application allowed with conditions.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The court held that the entire mixture must be considered when determining "commercial quantity" under NDPS, including neutral substances and solutions (Note 4). (!) (!) - The mushroom/magic mushroom cannot be treated as a mixture and may not fall under commercial quantity; the court discusses limiting applicability of Note 4 to mushrooms. (!) (!) - Bail is the rule and jail is the exception, with conditions for release (bond, appearance, restrictions). (!) (!) (!) - The petitioner was released on bail with stringent conditions after analyzing quantity and lack of clear commercial threshold for psilocybin in mushrooms. (!) - The case outlines that if commercial quantity is not applicable, Section 37 safety limits may not apply, supporting bail. (!)

What is the meaning of "mixture" for the purposes of determining small or commercial quantity under the NDPS Act?

What is the appropriate approach to whether mushrooms/magic mushrooms can be treated as a commercial quantity or not for bail under the NDPS Act?

What are the bail principles applicable when the accused has no criminal antecedents and is in custody for a prolonged period?


ORDER

This Bail Application is 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.92/2024 of Mananthavady Excise Circle O Wayanad. The above case is registered against the petitioner alleging o Section 22(c) & 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(A) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘Act 1985’). The petitioner was arrested on 04.10.2024 and has been in judicial custody since then.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that, on 04.10.2024 at about 01.45 PM, the accused was found in possession and transporting 6.59 gm of Charas, 13.2gm of Ganja, 226gm of Psilocybin contained magic mushroom and 50gm Psilocybin contained magic mushroom capsules, while travelling in the ISUZU V-cross Car bearing registration No.KA.02-MM 3309 at Edayakode Colony, Thrissilery Taluk in contravention of the provisions of Act 1985. Hence, it is alleged that the accused committed the above said o

4. Heard Adv. Smt. Veena Hari, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the Senior Public Prosecutor Adv. Sri. Noushad K.A., for the State.

5. Adv. Smt. Veena Hari submitted that, even if the entire allegations are accepted, the contraband seized will not come within the purview of “commercial quantity†and hence, Section 22(c) of the Act 1985 is not applicable. Therefore, the counsel submitted that the petitioner is entitled bail. Adv. Veena Hari submitted that the Charas and Ganja alleged to be seized from the petitioner are admittedly small quantities. She also contended that the other contraband seized from the petitioner was magic mushrooms and magic mushroom capsules. It is the case of the counsel that Psilocybin contained magic mushrooms and Psilocybin contained magic mushroom capsules seized from the petitioner are about 276 gms. The counsel submitted that the Psilocybin contained in these magic mushrooms is not separately quanti the prosecution. The counsel also relied on an article which is available on the Internet as evidenced by Annexure-A5 and submitted that based on the studies, the average Psilocybin content is 1% per one gram of Psilocybe cubensis mushroom. Hence, it is submitted that, even if the entire magic mushroom seized from the petitioner is taken as a whole, it will come within the purview of small quantity and the petitioner is entitled bail. The counsel also submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 04.10.2024 onwards. The counsel submitted that the petitioner is a person who obtained an MS Degree in Computer Science from Rochester Institute of Technology, United States of America. It is also submitted that the petitioner was working in Dell Computers as a Cyber Security Analyst in the United States of America. The petitioner produced Annexure-A2 and A3 to prove the same. It is the case of the petitioner that, he has come to India in connection with his mother’s illness. The petitioner produced Annexure-A4 Discharge Summary of his mother who has renal failure and had a kidney transplant. The counsel also submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court, if bail is granted to him.

6. Adv. Sri. Noushad K.A., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor, seriously opposed the bail application. The Public Prosecutor took me through serial No.145 of the Table in the Act 1985 and submitted that the small quantity of Psilocybin is 2 gm and commercial quantity is 50gm. The Public Prosecutor also took me through Note 4 below the Table and submitted that the quantities shown in columns No.5 and 6 of the Table relating to the respective drugs shown in Column No.2 shall apply to the entire mixture or any solution or any one or more narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances of that particular drug in dosage form or isomers, esters, ethers and salts of these drugs, including salts esters, ethers and isomers, wherever existence of such substance is


                                                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                        1
                                                        2
                                                        3
                                                        4
                                                        5
                                                        6
                                                        7
                                                        8
                                                        9
                                                        10
                                                        11
                                                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                        supreme today icon
                                                        logo-black

                                                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                        Please visit our Training & Support
                                                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                        qr

                                                        Scan Me!

                                                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                        whatsapp-icon Back to top