Back
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, P. KRISHNA KUMAR
SAJEEVAN SWAMY S/O RAVEENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
JOHNSON (DIED) S/O RAPPAYI – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
1. The petitioner suffered an ex-parte order of eviction [Ext.R2(a)] dated 31.01.2015 under section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (‘the Act’ for short). On 18/02/2015, he filed an application to set aside the ex-parte order. As the said application was filed without a petition to condone the delay, the court dismissed the application by Ext.P4 order. The court also rejected the explanation offered by the petitioner for setting aside the ex-parte order i.e. the petitioner was under the impression that the matter would be settled by the opposite party.
2. The petitioner filed an appeal against the said order. He alleges that the appeal was transferred to the Additional District Court, Irinjalakkuda from the District Court, Thrissur and it was not intimated to the petitioner and consequently, the appeal was dismissed for default. In the meantime, the person who initiated the rent control proceedings died, and the petitioner was unable to trace out the details of his legal heirs. As a result, the application submitted by the petitioner for readmitting the appeal was also dismissed for default, it is contended. Resultantly,
An eviction order under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act must demonstrate the court's satisfaction regarding the landlord's bona fide claim, even in ex-parte proceedings.
Where there has been an appeal against a decree passed ex-parte under this rule, and the appeal has been disposed of on any ground other than the ground that the appellant has withdrawn appeal, no ap....
Courts have a duty to ensure that there is no judicial contribution to delay.
Eviction proceedings under the Goa Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act are valid if the tenant fails to deposit rent as required, and the landlord's bona fide requirement can justify evict....
R.12(3) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings Rules mandates that a court has discretion to stay execution proceedings only if certain conditions are met.
Fraud must be challenged promptly; undue delay in seeking relief undermines claims.
Point of law : order passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority, on an application for condonation of delay filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, should give brief reasons for arriving at ....
The main legal point established is the importance of a liberal and justice-oriented approach in dealing with applications to condone delay, considering the elastic nature of the term 'sufficient cau....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
