JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by Ext.P7 order passed in E.A. No.10/2022 in E.P. No.80/2020 in O.S. No.130/2017 of the Court of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Kottayam, (court below), the applicants in the above execution application are before this Court under Article 227 of Constitution of India. The respondents in the above application are the respondents in the original petition.

2. The skeletal facts, relevant for the determination of the original petition, are: the petitioners are the legal representatives of the deceased K.P.Samuel, who had filed O.S.No.130/2017 before the court below against the respondents 1 to 3, inter alia, to declare that the sale deed executed by him in favour of the respondents 1 and 2 is null and void and the rental deed executed by him in favour of the 3rd respondent was under vitiating circumstances. It was his case that, he had availed a loan from the respondents 1 and 2, who are money lenders, and he was forced to execute the sale deed in favour of respondents 1 and 2, as a security for the loan. The respondents 1 and 2 in turn sold the property to the third respondent. The third respondent filed R.C.P.No.12/2017 (R.C.P) before the Rent Controller, Changana