IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ
Manoharan S/o. Rajan - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
CRL.A NO. 1624 OF 2023
Decided On : 18-03-2025
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 325 - Appeal against conviction for murder - The appellant was initially convicted under Section 302 IPC for causing death but was later found guilty under Section 325 IPC for causing grievous hurt - The prosecution failed to establish a direct causal link between the injuries inflicted and the death of the deceased due to lack of medical evidence and complications arising post-injury. (Paras 34 - 36 )
(B) Causation in Criminal Law - The court emphasized that the prosecution must establish a clear causal link between the act and the death, noting that complications or delays in death could disrupt this chain. (Paras 28 - 32 )
(C) Eyewitness Testimony - The court found the testimony of eyewitnesses credible regarding the altercation but noted inconsistencies regarding the cause of death and injury specifics. (Paras 27 - 35 )
Facts of the case:
The appellant was accused of murdering Muniyappan during an altercation on 02.10.2018, where he allegedly assaulted the deceased with a stone and banged his head on the road. Muniyappan succumbed to injuries later on 13.11.2018. (Paras 1 - 3 )
Findings of Court:
The court determined that the prosecution did not conclusively establish a direct causal link between the injuries and the death, leading to a conviction under Section 325 instead of Section 302 IPC. (Paras 34 - 36 )
Issues: The main issues addressed included whether the appellant's actions directly caused the death of Muniyappan and the adequacy of evidence supporting the charge under Section 302 IPC. (Paras 34 - 35 )
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while the appellant's actions led to grievous hurt, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that these actions directly caused death, necessitating a conviction under Section 325 IPC. (Paras 34 - 36 )
Result: The appeal is partly allowed; conviction under Section 302 IPC is set aside, and the appellant is convicted under Section 325 IPC with a sentence of five years of rigorous imprisonment.
JUDGMENT
Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.
This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 04.03.2021 in S.C.No. 245 of 2019 on the file of the Court of Session, Kozhikode. In the said case, the appellant was indicted for having committed an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. By the impugned judgment, he was found guilty and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of ?50,000/-, with a default clause, for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the IPC .
3. According to the prosecution, the appellant is a rag-picker by profession.He along with the deceased Muniyappan used to be engaged in collecting scrap materials in the city of Kozhikode. On 02.10.2018 at about 9:45 a.m., the first informant as well as PWs 1 and 2 are alleged to have seen the appellant and the deceased engaged in an altercation under the AKG Over Bridge situated at Nagaram Amsom Desom in Kozhikode. It is alleged that the appellant took a granite stone and after exhorting Muniyappan that he would be killed, hit him on his head. When the deceased fell down, the appellant is alleged to have sat on his body, held his head, and banged it on the road. The local people assembled at the spot and they intimated the police. The injured was shifted to the Government Medical College Hospital, Kozhikode. Urgent Craniotomy was done, and after undergoing treatment for some time, his family members took the deceased to the KAPV Govt. Medical College, Tamil Nadu and thereafter to the MGM Govt. Hospital, Trichy. His discharge from the Medical College Hospital, Kozhikode, was on 16.10.2018. While undergoing treatment in various hospitals at Trichy, as there was no improvement, the deceased was discharged from the hospital. While he was convalescing at home, on13.11.2018, at 5:00 p.m., he breathed his last.
4. The records before this Court reveal that the First Information Statement was furnished by one Vincent Elanhikkal before the Chemmangad Police Station at 2:18 p.m. on 02.10.2018. Based on the information so furnished, Crime No. 167 of 2018 was registered under Section 307 of the IPC . Thereafter, the investigation was taken over by PW15, the Sub Inspector of Police, Chemmangad Police Station. After taking over the investigation, she went to the hospital and found that the injured was unconscious. The Investigating Officer then went to the hospital on 12.10.2018 and recorded the statement of Dr. Soman, who had conducted surgery. The Officer realized that on 16.10.2018, the injured was discharged from the hospital and taken to his native place. She recorded the statement of the daughter of the deceased, who was informed that in case of any untoward development, she should inform PW15. On 14.11.2018, PW15 was informed by Ranjitha (PW4), the daughter of the deceased, that her father had passed away. The Investigating Officer asked her not to conduct funeral ceremonies, and immediately rushed to Tamil Nadu and reached Karur District at about 5:00 p.m. On reaching there, she realised that on 13.11.2018 at 11:00 p.m., Muniyappan had passed away and that he had already been cremated. Later, she recorded the statements of the family members of the deceased and obtained records from the hospital, where he was treated. She obtained the One and the Same Certificate from the Village Office since Muniyappan was called by some other name as well. The Death Certificate from the concerned Village Officer was also obtained. After returning back, she went to the place of occurrence and seized MO1, which is alleged to be the stone used by the accused for infliction of the injuries. MO1 stone was forwarded to the Forensic Science Lab. After completion of the investigation, the final report was laid before the jurisdictional court.
5. Committal proceedings were initiated by the learned Magistrate in accordance with the law, and the case was committe
The prosecution must establish a clear causal link between an accused's actions and the resulting death; failure to do so may lead to a conviction for a lesser offense.
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide is based on the degree of intent, with the latter applicable when death results from an act done with knowledge of its likelihood but without inte....
Conviction requires reliable evidence and knowledge of victim's medical condition; lacking such knowledge limits liability to lesser offenses.
The court reaffirmed that intention and the nature of injuries are critical in distinguishing between murder and culpable homicide under IPC.
Murder conviction quashed for lack of proof that specific appellants inflicted fatal blow; eyewitness contradictions, medical evidence allowing death by fall, parity with acquitted co-accused, and un....
It is the quality and not the quantity which determines the adequacy of evidence. Evidence has to be weighed not counted.
The inmate of a house must provide a satisfactory explanation when a death occurs within, as failing to do so can imply complicity in homicide.
The cumulative nature of multiple severe injuries inflicted by the accused established intent to kill, leading to a conviction for murder, affirming that the delayed death does not break the causal c....
Point of law: It is true that the injury possible by fall on hard surface but depending on the force. It is true an alcoholic may sustain easily the rupture of blood vessels even at the slightest vio....
The court established that the conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder is justified when intent to kill is not proven, relying on witness credibility and evidential discrepancies.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.