SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 243

A. BADHARUDEEN
Sunitha C. K. W/o Satheesh M. G. – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BY ADVS. S.RAJEEV V.VINAY M.S.ANEER PRERITH PHILIP JOSEPH ANILKUMAR C.R. K.S.KIRAN KRISHNAN NOURIN S. FATHIMA
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI JIBU T S

ORDER

The 2 nd accused in S.C.No.982/2023 on the files of Special Court for the trial of offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act , Palakkad, has filed this Crl.M.C under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash all further proceedings against the petitioner in the above case.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/2 nd accused and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail. Even though notice was served upon the 2 nd respondent/defacto complainant, she did not turn up.

3. In this case prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 354A (1)(ii) and 506 (i) of the Indian Penal Code (` IPC ’ for short) and under Sections 8 r/w 7, 10 r/w 9(l), 9(n), 12 r/w 11(i) and 21 r/w 10 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (`POCSO Act’ for short), by the 1 st accused. The allegation against the 2 nd accused is that she has committed offence punishable under Section 21 r/w 19 of the POCSO Act since she failed to inform the


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top