C. JAYACHANDRAN
ROSAMMA JOSE W/O XAVIAR JOSE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Petitioners herein are accused nos. 2 and 3 in Crime No. 422/2019 of Alappuzha South Police Station, which is now pending before the Special Court under the POCSO Act, Alappuzha as S.C. No. 666/2020. The petitioners seek quashment of the said crime on various counts. The offences alleged are under Section 21(1), read with Section 19 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor on behalf of the respondents. Perused the records.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that for attracting the offence under Section 21(1) of the POCSO Act, there should be failure on the part of the person/accused to report the commission of offence as enjoined by Section 19 of the POCSO Act. Referring to Section 19, learned counsel would submit that there is no mandate that such crime shall be reported forthwith. In the instant case, the incident occurred on 07.03.2019 and the same was reported by the petitioners (accused nos. 2 and 3) on 11.03.2019. There was neither any failure to report the incident; nor was there any serious delay in such reporting. Therefore, the offences sought to be canvassed against the petitioners will
The POCSO Act does not require immediate reporting of offences; reasonable delay due to intervening circumstances does not constitute a failure under Sections 19 and 21(1).
A one-day delay in reporting an offense under the PoCSO Act does not constitute willful omission, thus not attracting liability under Sections 19 and 21.
Insufficient evidence to establish criminal liability under POCSO Act when both the accused and the witness had a duty to report, emphasizing the need for more than mere statements.
Mandatory reporting of offences under the POCSO Act is crucial, and failure to report is punishable, emphasizing the seriousness of non-compliance.
Failure to promptly report knowledge of a sexual offence against a child constitutes an offence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and is punishable under Section 21.
The court ruled that a mother's delay in reporting her daughter's pregnancy, due to trauma, does not constitute a deliberate failure under the PoCSO Act, justifying quashment of proceedings against h....
Criminal liability under the POCSO Act requires a deliberate omission to report a crime, which was not established in this case.
Prompt and Proper Reporting – Prompt and proper reporting of the commission of offence under the POCSO Act is of utmost importance and its failure on coming to know about the commission of any offenc....
The interpretation of 'knowledge' under Section 19(1) of the POCSO Act requires direct awareness of the offense, and a reasonable timeframe must be considered for reporting obligations, particularly ....
Failure to provide information about offence to Police – A person can be supposed to know only where there is a direct appeal to his senses – There is no obligation on this person to investigate and ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.