SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 444

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM 
G. GIRISH, J.
T.G. Rajaram Shenoy S/o Govinda Shenoy - Petitioner 
Versus
K.K. Hari Pai S/o Krishna Pai - Respondent 
Crl. MC No. 5702 of 2019
Decided On : 01-04-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
BY ADVS.DINESH R.SHENOY SRI.EBIN MATHEW
SRI.P.ROHIT PREMANANDAN SHENOY
BY ADVS. SRI.K.J.JOSEPH (ERNAKULAM) FOR R1
SRI.B.DEEPAK FOR R1
SRI.SANGEETHARAJ.N.R, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

IMPORTANT POINT
The court affirmed that a Magistrate can direct police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. even after taking cognizance of an offense, emphasizing the need for thorough inquiry into allegations.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Section 156(3) - Challenge to order forwarding complaint for FIR registration - Allegations of conspiracy to murder a religious figure - The learned Magistrate's order to forward the complaint to police for investigation was upheld, as the court found no legal impediment to revert to pre-cognizance stage after taking cognizance in a related case. (Paras 1 , 4 , 9 , 11 )

(B) Criminal Procedure - Cognizance and Investigation - The court emphasized that once cognizance is taken, the Magistrate can still direct investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. - The court highlighted the need for a thorough investigation into the allegations without pre-empting the findings of the lower court. (Paras 8 , 10 )

Facts of the case:

The petitioners challenged the Magistrate's order forwarding a complaint alleging conspiracy to murder a religious leader, claiming the complaint was baseless and motivated by personal interests. The complaint was filed after the death of the leader, who was discharged from a hospital under questionable circumstances.

Findings of Court:

The court found that the learned Magistrate acted within his jurisdiction in forwarding the complaint for investigation, and the allegations warranted further inquiry.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the Magistrate could revert to the pre-cognizance stage after having taken cognizance in a related case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Magistrate retains the authority to direct police investigation under Section 156(3) even after taking cognizance, as the investigation encompasses the entire process of evidence collection.

Result: Petition dismissed.

ORDER :

The order dated 09.07.2019 in C.M.P.No.583/2018 on the files of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chottanikkara is under challenge in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C at the instance of the person arraigned as accused Nos.11 and 14 in the aforesaid C.M.P. The learned Magistrate, by the impugned order, had forwarded the above C.M.P to the S.H.O of Police, Ambalamedu for the registration of F.I.R and report.

2. The allegations against the petitioners herein in the complaint filed as C.M.P.No.583/2018 before the learned Magistrate, in conspectus, are as follows:

The petitioner/complainant in that C.M.P is a devotee of late Swami Sudheendra Theertha, the devotional Guru of Gauda Saraswata Brahmin community, and the supreme head of Kashi Math. Accused Nos.1 to 7 and Accused Nos.10 to 16, who are associated with the above community, conspired with Accused Nos.8 and 9 who are respectively the Managing Director of Seven Hills Hospital, Mumbai and a Doctor of the said hospital who treated Swami Sudheendra Theertha, to commit murder of the above said Swami, and got the said Swami discharged from that hospital on 16.01.2016 at a time when the physical and mental condition of the said Swami were totally deplorable. Swami Sudheendra Theertha, who was aged 90, was admitted in that hospital in the month of December, 2015, and he was undergoing treatment there for multiple ailments including age related issues. At about 06:30 a.m on 16.01.2016, the said Swami was discharged from that hospital in accordance with the conspiracy of the accused, and airlifted to Dehradun. Thereafter, by about 01:30 p.m on the same day, the said Swami was taken to Kashi Math at Haridwar by road at a time when his condition was extremely worse. On 17.01.2016, at about 01:30 a.m, a formal declaration was made by the second accused that Shrimad Sudheendra Theertha Swami attained samadhi at 01:30 a.m. The accused were fully aware of the fact that the above said Swami would not survive if he was discharged from the hospital in that condition and taken to Haridwar where there was a bitter cold climate of extreme winter. The accused did not care to take the said Swami to a hospital at Haridwar with the deliberate intention to ensure his death. The conspiracy to execute the murder of Sudheendra Theertha Swami, was hatched at the Kashi Math Ashram at Ambalamedu in Ernakulam District. After the death of the Swami, his body was placed in ‘Padmasana’ and consecrated at the Haridwar Ashram. All the above acts were pre-planned and executed by the accused to accomplish their vested interests. Though complaints were preferred before the police about the above criminal acts committed by the accused, they did not take any action due to the influence of the accused. Hence, a complaint was filed before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chottanikkara as C.M.P.No.937/2016, which is pending enquiry before the said Court. Therefore, it is highly necessary that the complaint has to be forwarded to the Police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C for investigation and report.

3. The complaint in the above regard was initially posted along with C.M.P.No.937/2016 pending enquiry under section 202 Cr.P.C. before the learned Magistrate in respect of the same incident. The learned Magistrate, instead of sending C.M.P.No.937/2016 to the police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C, had proceeded with the case in accordance with Chapter XV of the Code of Criminal Procedure. At the time of filing of C.M.P.No.583/2018, the complainant in C.M.P.No.937/2016 and one witness (who is none other than the complainant in C.M.P.No.583/2018, himself) were already examined on oath, and the relevant medical records were summoned from Seven Hills Hospital, Mumbai. It was in the meanwhile that the first witness in C.M.P.No.937/2016 had filed C.M.P.No.583/2018 in respect of the same incident with a request to direct the police to register a crime and to commence investigation upon the allegation of murd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top