IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S., JJ
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, – Appellant
Versus
Satwashil Vasant Mane – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Easwaran S., J.)
This intra-court appeal is preferred by the Revenue aggrieved by the judgment dated 7.1.2025 of the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.21868/2024 directing the appellants to grant interest on the amount of refund ordered.
2. The brief facts for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:
The 1st respondent-assessee approached the writ court aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the appellants in not releasing interest on the amount of refund to which the 1st respondent-assessee was entitled to in pursuance to issuance of a certificate in Form-5 under Sections 5(2) r/w 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. By an order of assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2016-17, the assessee was assessed to a total income of Rs.1,86,80,000/-, which includes an addition of Rs.75,00,000/- as unexplained investment. In the meantime, the assessee filed a declaration and undertaking under sub-Section (5) of Section 4 of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 ('Act', for short). On filing of the said undertaking and declaration, a certificate was drawn by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-I, Koz
The court held that the Revenue is accountable for delayed refunds and must pay interest despite the exclusion in the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.
In tax matters, entitlement to interest on delayed refunds, including on interest accrued, is affirmed, highlighting the principle that overdue amounts accrue additional interest.
Petitioner entitled to interest on delayed refund from the date of entitlement, despite provisions of VSV Act prohibiting interest prior to refund determination.
The court ruled that interest on delayed refund is due despite provisions of the VSV Act denying such interest, emphasizing accountability for wrongful retention of funds.
The obligation to refund tax amounts includes the right to interest for undue retention, as established in the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the words 'amount of refund' in Section 244A(1)(a) must be given their natural meaning, entitling the appellant to interest on the whole refun....
Interest on delayed refunds under the CGST Act is automatic and obligatory, reinforcing the beneficial nature of the legislation.
Taxpayers are entitled to interest on refunds under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, and this does not constitute 'interest on interest'.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner was entitled to interest on the amount paid under Section 220(2) of the Act as part of the refund under Section 240 of the Act.....
The requirement of a formal application for refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, is a statutory mandate, and interest on a delayed refund is payable from the date of receipt of s....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.