IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., P.V.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
Rajesh K.r. S/o. Raveendran Nair – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.
The instant appeal is preferred challenging the finding of guilt, conviction and sentence passed by the Court of Sessions, Kottayam, in S.C.No. 133 of 2019 on the files of the said court. In the above case, the appellant was accused of committing maternal incest and he was charged under Section 376(2)(f) & (n) of the IPC. By the impugned judgment, he was found guilty and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000/- for the offences charged.
2. According to the prosecution, the survivor, who is the mother of the appellant, had three sons. The appellant was residing with his mother in house bearing No. 125 in Ward No.VIII of Vazhappally Grama Panchayat. As per the charge, on 29.08.2018, at about 9.30 p.m., the appellant committed rape on PW1 on multiple occasions till the dawn on the next day.
3. On 06.09.2018 at 1.55 p.m., PW1 went to the Changanassery Police Station to lodge the statement. However, on reaching the Police Station, she collapsed and was therefore rushed to the Government General Hospital, Changanassery. While in the casualty, Ext.P1 statement of PW1 was recorded by PW11, the Senior Women Police Office
The testimony of a sexual assault victim is credible and can support conviction despite minor discrepancies; absence of physical injuries does not negate the reliability of the victim's account.
The prosecution must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and inconsistencies in the survivor's testimony led to the acquittal of the accused.
The sole testimony of the victim can be relied upon in a rape case, but it must be trustworthy and unblemished. The evidence must be of a very high quality and must be consistent, natural, and match ....
In a case of rape, conviction can be sustained basing on solitary testimony of prosecutrix – No undue leniency can be shown towards accused.
The conviction of a defendant for sexual offences against a minor can be upheld based on the credible testimony of the victim even in the presence of minor inconsistencies in her statements.
The court upheld the conviction of the accused for the offence of rape under Sec. 376(2)(f) IPC, emphasizing the reliability of the victim's testimony and the corroboration from medical evidence.
In rape cases, victim's testimony must be credible and reliable; inconsistencies can undermine a conviction.
The court affirmed that a victim's consistent testimony, corroborated by medical evidence, is sufficient for conviction in sexual assault cases, despite minor inconsistencies.
The court affirmed that the victim's testimony, corroborated by DNA evidence, is sufficient for conviction in sexual assault cases, emphasizing the need for sensitivity in evaluating such evidence.
The absence of physical injuries does not negate a credible victim's testimony in rape cases, which can be sufficient for conviction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.