SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 677

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
Gangadharan, S/o.C.K.Krishnan - Appellant
Versus 
State Of Kerala - Respondents 
Bail Appl. No. 3395 of 2025
Decided on : 19-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : BY ADVS. K.J.MANU RAJ K.C.VISWAMBHARAN K.VINAYA ADONIYA GIGI
For the Respondent: SRI G SUDHEER, PP

IMPORTANT POINT
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail unless compelling reasons exist to deny it.

Headnote:

(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 482 - Bail applications - The petitioner, accused in multiple crimes, sought bail based on prior releases in similar cases. The court emphasized that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, referencing the Supreme Court's principles on bail. (Paras 7 , 8 , 9 )

(B) Bail - The court reiterated that the grant of bail should not be denied as a form of punishment and must be considered objectively based on the law. (Paras 7 , 9 )

Facts of the case:

The petitioner is accused of fraud involving a chit fund scheme, where complainants were promised returns but did not receive their investments.

Findings of Court:

The court granted bail, allowing the petitioner to cooperate with the investigation under specified conditions.

Issues: The main issues included the appropriateness of granting bail given the nature of the allegations and the petitioner's prior bail status.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that bail should be granted unless there are compelling reasons to deny it, reaffirming the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception.

Result: Bail applications allowed.

ORDER :

P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

Petitioner in these Bail Applications filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ) is one and the same and therefore, I am disposing of these cases by a common order.

2. The petitioner is an accused in different crimes at Vadanappally Police Station, Pavarratty Police Station and Chavakkad Police Station.

3. The prosecution case is that the Pravasi Syndicate Chits Private Limited (Malayali Kshema Nidhi Limited) is operated by accused No.1 and 2. They assured the defacto complainants that, they would provide 12% interest on the deposited amount. Relying on this, the defacto complainants in these cases deposited huge amount. However, they did not obtain the principal amount or the promised interest. Hence it is alleged that the accused committed the above said offences.

4. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor.

5. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is released on bail in several other cases, under Section 482 of BNSS . The counsel submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide any conditions if this court grant him on bail. The Public Prosecutor opposed the bail applications.

6. This Court considered the contentions of the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor. It is an admitted fact that the petitioner was released on bail in several crimes registered for same set of facts by Pavarratty Police Station and Thrissur Town West Police Station. In such circumstances, the petitioner can be granted bail in these bail applications also.

7. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chidambaram. P v Directorate of Enforcement [2019 (16) SCALE 870] , after considering all the earlier judgments, observed that, the basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception so as to ensure that the accused has the opportunity of securing fair trial.

8. Moreover, in Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India [2024 KHC 6431], the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:

“21. Before we part with the Judgment, we must mention here that the Special Court and the High Court did not consider the material in the charge sheet objectively. Perhaps the focus was more on the activities of PFI, and therefore, the appellant's case could not be properly appreciated. When a case is made out for a grant of bail, the Courts should not have any hesitation in granting bail. The allegations of the prosecution may be very serious. But, the duty of the Courts is to consider the case for grant of bail in accordance with the law. "Bail is the rule and jail is an exception" is a settled law. Even in a case like the present case where there are stringent conditions for the grant of bail in the relevant statutes, the same rule holds good with only modification that the bail can be granted if the conditions in the statute are satisfied. The rule also means that once a case is made out for the grant of bail, the Court cannot decline to grant bail. If the Courts start denying bail in deserving cases, it will be a violation of the rights guaranteed under Art.21 of our Constitution.” (underline supplied)

9. In Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement [2024 KHC 6426], also the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:

“53. The Court further observed that, over a period of time, the trial courts and the High Courts have forgotten a very well - settled principle of law that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment. From our experience, we can say that it appears that the trial courts and the High Courts attempt to play safe in matters of grant of bail. The principle that bail is a rule and refusal is an exception is, at times, followed in breach. On account of non - grant of bail even in straight forward open and shut cases, this Court is flooded with huge number of bail petitions thereby adding to the huge pendency. It is high time that the trial

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top