HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
N.PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
S BINDU – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner has filed this contempt case, invoking the provisions under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act , 1971, alleging willful disobedience of the directions contained in Annexure A1 judgment of this Court dated 14.02.2023 in W.P.(C) No.4729 of 2023- Major Vellayani Devi Temple Advisory Committee v. State of Kerala [2023 (2) KHC 290] by not taking sufficient measures to ensure that politics has no role to play in the conduct of daily worship, ceremonies and festivals in temples. The instance pointed out in this contempt case in connection with the annual festival of Kadakkal Devi Temple, which is a temple under the management of the Travancore Devaswom Board, is regarding a programme conducted on 10.03.2025, in which one singer named Aloshi performed political songs and displayed flags of a political party in the background.
2. The said incident is the subject matter of W.P.(C) No.10893 of 2025 filed before this Court on 17.03.2025, in which this Court has passed a detailed order on 18.03.2025. The said order reads thus;
“The petitioner, who is a devotee of Kadakkal Devi Temple, which is a temple under the management of the 2nd respondent





Political activities are incompatible with the sanctity of temple worship and ceremonies, and the Travancore Devaswom Board must ensure compliance with this principle.
Temples under the management of the Travancore Devaswom Board must remain apolitical, following the provisions of the Religious Institutions (Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1988, which prohibits politica....
Point of Law : Section 31A of Act deals with formation of Temple Advisory Committees.
Only the Temple Advisory Committee constituted under Section 31A of the Act can conduct activities and collect funds in the temple; unauthorized committees are prohibited from interfering.
A writ of mandamus can only be issued when there is a clear statutory duty and legal right, which was not established by the petitioners in this case.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the Travancore Devaswom Board to manage temple properties, perform traditional rites, and ensure compliance with statutory duties an....
Only the Temple Advisory Committee can conduct religious rites and collect contributions in temples managed by the Cochin Devaswom Board, as per statutory provisions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the legal impermissibility of unauthorized committees collecting funds in Hindu religious institutions, emphasizing the need for strict compliance ....
The extension of a Temple Advisory Committee's term without addressing complaints against its members is arbitrary and unjust, warranting judicial intervention and direct administration by the govern....
A writ of mandamus requires the existence of a legal right and a statutory duty, which the petitioner failed to demonstrate, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.