Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI
Gigi Joseph, W/o V.Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Kerala State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
T.R.RAVI, J.
The petitioner who was working as Superintendent in the Pension and Audit Department of the Chief Office of the KSRTC was ordered to be transferred as per Ext.P1 to Malappuram unit. The order of transfer is challenged in this writ petition. By Ext.P1 order, 14 Superintendents were transferred. Consequently transfers of 13 other Superintendents were effected to adjust the staff strength. It can be seen that four persons were transferred to the Chief Office and four persons from the Chief Office were transferred to other offices. The petitioner has challenged the transfer on the ground that it is against the guidelines of transfer which is part of bipartite settlement between the management and the unions. Specific reference is made to Clauses 1.0.2, 1.0.5 and 9.02 of Ext.P2. The English translation of the guidelines has been produced as Ext.R1(a) along with a counter affidavit of the KSRTC. The petitioner contends that she has only 19 months left for retirement and such persons are protected as per Clause 9.02. It is also contended that she joined in the Chief office only two years back and there are persons who are remaining in the Chief Office for more than f
Transfers of employees are service incidents and not subject to legal challenge without clear proof of mala fides or statutory violations.
Judicial interference in employee transfers is limited to cases of mala fides or statutory violations; otherwise, the employer's prerogative prevails.
Transfer orders are within the employer's discretion and not subject to judicial review unless vitiated by mala fides or statutory violations.
Judicial interference in employee transfer orders is limited to cases of mala fides or statutory violations; otherwise, the employer's discretion prevails.
Judicial review of employee transfers is limited; transfers are administrative unless proven mala fide or in violation of statutory provisions.
Government servants have no vested right to remain posted at a place of their choice and can be transferred in administrative exigencies. Interference with transfer orders should be limited to cases ....
Judicial review of transfer orders is limited; transfers are valid unless proven to be made in mala fides or in violation of statutory provisions.
Government servants have no vested right to remain posted at a place of their choice, and interference with transfer orders should be limited to cases of mala fides or violation of specific provision....
The court affirmed that transfer orders are administrative decisions and should not be interfered with unless proven to be arbitrary or in violation of statutory provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
