IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AMIT RAWAL, K.V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ.
Shilpa D. - Appellant
Versus
Union of India Rep. by its Secretary, New Delhi - Respondent
O.P. (CAT) No. 92 of 2024
Decided On : 28-05-2025
(A) Cadre Allocation Policy for All India Services - Office Memorandum dated 10.04.2008 - Allocation of cadre to IPS officers - The applicant, an SC officer from Karnataka, was wrongfully allotted to Kerala as an outsider instead of her home cadre - The Tribunal failed to adequately address the violation of the insider-outsider roster in the allocation process. (Paras 1-30)
(B) Principle of Equality - The court emphasized that the allocation process must adhere to the principles of equality and fairness, ensuring that insider candidates are not unjustly deprived of their rightful positions. (Paras 22-30)
Facts of the case:
The applicant, an SC lady officer from Karnataka, was allotted to the Kerala cadre despite being an insider, raising concerns about the adherence to the Cadre Allocation Policy and the insider-outsider roster.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the allocation process did not follow the established insider-outsider roster, resulting in the applicant being denied her rightful cadre.
Issues: The main issues included whether the allocation process adhered to the insider-outsider roster and the implications of the Cadre Allocation Policy.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the allocation process must comply with the Cadre Allocation Policy, emphasizing the need for equitable treatment of candidates based on their insider status.
Result: The order of the Central Administrative Tribunal was quashed, and the applicant was directed to be granted the Karnataka cadre.
JUDGMENT :
AMIT RAWAL, J.
1. Present O.P. (CAT) is directed against the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 12.10.2023 rejecting O.A. No.139 of 2020 wherein the following reliefs were claimed:
"a. Call for the record leading to the issue of Annexure A7 and A9 and quash the same to the extent they pertain to applicant's allotment to Kerala Cadre.
b. Direct the Respondents to consider afresh applicant's claim for allotment of Home Cadre of Karnataka and to cause issue of necessary orders allotting the applicant to her Home cadre of Karnataka with all consequential benefits in the matter of seniority etc.
c. Pass any other order or direction that this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem it fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the present case and in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Succinctly, the facts in brief for adjudication of the controversy are enumerated herein below:
Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Department of Personnel and Training, vide Office Memorandum dated 10.04.2008, came out with a Cadre Allocation Policy for All India Services - IAS/IPS/IFS (hereinafter called 'CAP -2008'). As per the aforementioned Office Memorandum, the State Governments were required to indicate the total number of vacancies to be filled through a particular Civil Services Examination by 31st December of every year, prior to the year of examination. In respect of services under them, the respective Cadre Controlling Authorities, namely, the Department of Personnel and Training (DOPT)/Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA)/Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) shall determine the vacancies including the break-up into Unreserved (UR)/Scheduled Caste (SC)/Scheduled Tribe (ST)/Other Backward Classes (OBC)/ Insider/Outsider vacancies, for each of the cadres as per the established procedure, keeping in view, the number of districts in the State, the cadre gap in the cadre, the requisitions received from the State Government and the position of roster in the Cadre. The vacancies so determined would be communicated to the State Governments and published on the respective Ministry's website.
3. Paragraph No.2 of the aforementioned policy envisaged that a 200-point running vacancy-based- roster showing SC/ST/OBC/UR points shall be maintained for each Cadre properly and would be used for determining the vacancies of various categories (SC/ST/OBC/UR) in each Cadre. The accounting in this roster shall be done on the basis of actual filling of the roster point. This roster for each of the Cadres may be initialized by adjusting the recruitments done since the Civil Service Examination -1994.
4. The purpose of maintaining the aforesaid roster at the level of the Cadres is to ensure equitable representation to various categories and not to exactly implement the policy of reservation per se at the level of the Cadre.
5. Paragraph No.4 of the aforementioned policy had been a point of ponderance by the department in rejecting the representation, as well in bits and pieces by the Tribunal, much less agitated and relied upon by both the parties. Therefore, the same is extracted hereinbelow:
"4. The insider and outsider vacancies in a cadre shall be determined on the basis of the insider-outsider roster with points as follows: O-I-O-O-I-O and so on so as to facilitate the maintenance of the ratio of 1:2 between the insiders and the outsiders. It is, however, clarified that depending on the actual filling of the insider vacancies, the ratio between insiders and outsiders in a cadre at any point of time may, however, be less than 1: 2. There would be the following insider- outsider rosters for each cadre. first, for determining the total insiders and outsiders vacancies in the cadre; second, for determining the OBC insider/outsider vacancies and the SC/ST insider/outsider vacancies and third, for determining SC insider/outsider vacancies and ST insider/outsider vacancies. In the first step, the total Insid
The allocation of cadre to IPS officers must adhere to the principles of equality and the insider-outsider roster as per the Cadre Allocation Policy.
The allocation of cadre in the IAS is governed by strict principles that prioritize category-specific vacancies, and candidates do not have a right to claim allocation to their home state.
Cadre allocation decisions must adhere to a candidate's expressed preferences in order of merit; failing this, an insider status claim based on lower preferences is invalid.
Judicial intervention in cadre allocation is limited; rectifications post long delays can destabilize existing management unless egregious errors are proven.
Cadre – Scope of change – Finality has to be attached to process of selection.
A candidate belonging to a reserved category, if selected under the General/Open Category, is entitled to be considered for posting as per his or her preference on the basis of his or her merit among....
Reservation – For allocation of unreserved vacancy to a candidate of reserved category, selection must be on ‘General Standard’ without availing any ‘Relaxed Standard’ in either eligibility or select....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.