IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH
Nikhildas Son Of Dasan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
G.GIRISH, J.
The order dated 18.11.2023 of the Additional Sessions Court, Irinjalakuda, in CMP No.283/2023 in S.C.No.823/2021, disallowing the request of the accused Nos.2 & 5 in the said case to summon the Judicial First Class Magistrate concerned, who recorded the statement of PW3 under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(in short, ‘Cr.PC’), is under challenge in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.PC.
2. The aforesaid case relates to the murder of a lady, who was the aunt of PW3. PW3, the eyewitness to that incident, was aged only 15 years at the time of incident. At the time of investigation, his statement was recorded by the Judicial Magistrate concerned, under Section 164 Cr.PC. During the course of trial before the Sessions Court, PW3 gave evidence about the act of accused Nos.1 to 3 mounting physical assault upon the deceased by slashing her with a dagger, stabbing with knife and exploding hand grenade. He was cross-examined at length by the learned counsel for the accused. However, no contradictions were marked. At the time of defence evidence, the accused sought to examine the Magistrate who recorded the statement of PW3 under Section 164 Cr.PC.
The denial of the opportunity to examine a Magistrate who recorded a witness's prior statement constitutes a denial of justice, impacting the ability to prove contradictions.
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the importance of confronting witnesses with their previous statements to ensure a fair trial, as mandated by Section 145 of the Evidence Act a....
The duty of the court to ensure fair trials and the quest for truth in criminal proceedings.
Statements recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. are not substantive evidence and can only be used for contradiction or corroboration during cross-examination.
The admissibility of statements recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. as evidence and the conduct of the petitioner's counsel were central legal points established in the judgment.
A victim's statement under Section 164 of the CrPC cannot be recorded without the investigating agency's sponsorship to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
The accused has the right to call a defense witness and have a full opportunity to defend himself, including the recording of the statement of a Judicial Magistrate under section 164 of the Code of C....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the plenary power of the court under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code to summon any person at any stage of the proceedings as a witnes....
The evidentiary value of a statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. is limited and is used as an aid during trial.
The court emphasized that oversight in evidence presentation does not constitute a lacuna, and the power under Section 311 allows summoning witnesses if their evidence is essential for justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.