SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 1599

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM 
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
Santha Sadanandan, W/o. Sadanandan - Appellant 
Versus 
The State Police Chief Police Headquarters - Appellant 
WP(Crl.) No. 255 of 2025
Decided on : 26-05-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.REJI, M.V.THAMBAN, THARA THAMBAN, B.BIPIN, ARUN BOSE, JEENA A.V., THOMAS THOMAS, ARJUN R., RAGESH R.
For the Respondent: SRI. HRITHWICK C.S., SR.PP

The court upheld the police's decision not to register an FIR based on preliminary enquiry findings, allowing petitioners to seek redress through the Magistrate if dissatisfied.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 154 - Writ Petition for mandamus - Petitioners sought registration of separate FIRs for alleged fraud by members of a cooperative society and transfer of investigation to the State Crime Branch - No FIR registered despite complaints - Preliminary enquiry found no criminal offence made out. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Judicial Review - The court held that it would not interfere with the preliminary enquiry findings unless there is a clear violation of law or procedure. (Paras 3-4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners alleged fraud by the managing committee and staff of a cooperative society, claiming no FIR was registered despite their complaints.

Findings of Court:
The court found no basis for interference as the preliminary enquiry concluded no criminal offence was made out.

Issues: The main issue was whether the police's decision not to register an FIR was justified.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioners could approach the jurisdictional Magistrate if aggrieved by the investigation, emphasizing the need for a clear violation to warrant judicial intervention.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

The above Writ Petition(Crl.) is filed with the following prayers:

“i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents to register separate crimes for each frauds committed by the members of managing committee and staff of the Perinad, Service Co-operative Society Ltd. No.788.

ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any appropriate Writ, order or direction directing to the respondents to hand over investigation of the case to the State Crime Branch (Economic Offences Wing) supervised by the 1st respondent.

iii) To dispense with the translation of vernacular documents.

iv) To issue such other further reliefs as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case.”

2. The main grievance of the petitioners is that, no FIR is registered by the Police even though complaint is filed by them regarding the alleged fraud committed by the members of the Managing Committee and Staff of the Perinad Service Co-operative Society Ltd., No.788.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. \

4. The Public Prosecutor submitted that the complaint was received and a preliminary enquiry was conducted and it is found that no criminal offence is made out. In such circumstances, this Court need not interfere with the same. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the investigation, the petitioners can approach the jurisdictional Magistrate Court with appropriate application for investigation.

With the above observation, this Writ Petition(Crl.) is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top