IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
Abdul Rahman - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
W.P. (Crl.) No. 1334 of 2024
Decided On : 28-05-2025
(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections related to investigation and FIR registration - Writ petition seeking direction for the constitution of a special investigation team and adherence to guidelines from Lalita Kumari v. Government of U.P. - The court emphasized the need for proper investigation and the role of the 3rd respondent in deciding the necessity of a special investigation team and separate FIRs. (Paras 1-4)
(B) Judicial oversight - The court held that the 3rd respondent must review the Case Diary and determine the appropriate course of action regarding the investigation and FIRs. (Paras 2-4)
Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought a writ for the formation of a special investigation team to investigate complaints of a scam, asserting that separate FIRs should be registered for different victims.
Findings of Court:
The court directed the 3rd respondent to review the Case Diary and decide on the constitution of a special investigation team and the need for separate FIRs.
Issues: The main issues were the necessity of a special investigation team and the registration of separate FIRs for different victims.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the 3rd respondent must assess the Case Diary and determine the appropriate investigative measures, ensuring compliance with established guidelines.
Result: Writ Petition disposed of with directions.
JUDGMENT :
1. The Writ Petition (Crl.) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to constitute a special investigation team to conduct proper and effective investigation in the complaints preferred by the petitioners, under the Supervision of the 3rd Respondent herein.
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 4th respondent to ensure that the guidelines stipulated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of U.P. & Ors (supra) should be scrupulously followed.
iii. To dispense with the filing of English translation of documents marked in vernacular language.
iv. To grant any such other relief this Hon'ble Court deems fit.”[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this case is to issue a direction to the 2nd respondent to constitute a special investigation team to conduct a proper and effective investigation in the complaints preferred by the petitioners on the supervision of the 3rd respondent.
3. The Public Prosecutor submitted that Crime No. 1157/2024 is registered by the Edakkara Police Station based on the complaint of the 2nd petitioner and the other petitioners are the witnesses in the above crime. According to the petitioners, the victims are different and separate FIR is to be registered. Moreover, it is also submitted that it is a big scam and a special investigation team is to be constituted.
4. After hearing both sides, I am of the considered opinion that the 3rd respondent should look into the matter. The 3rd respondent should summon the Case Diary and decide whether any special investigation team is to be appointed in the facts and circumstances of the case. The 3rd respondent will also decide whether a separate FIR is to be registered for each cases. The decision taken by the 3rd respondent will be communicated to the petitioners. According to the petitioners, the cause of action and the year of the alleged cheating is also different. These are aspects to be considered by the 3rd respondent.
5. Therefore, this Writ Petition (Crl.) is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to call for the Case Diary in Crime No. 1157/2024 of Edakkara Police Station, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
2. The 3rd respondent will look into the Case Diary and decide whether a special investigation team is to be constituted for further investigation of the case. The 3rd respondent will also decide whether separate FIR is necessary based on the complaints of the petitioners. The decision taken by the 3rd respondent will be communicated to the petitioners within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The court directed the 3rd respondent to assess the Case Diary and determine the need for a special investigation team and separate FIRs, emphasizing adherence to established investigative guidelines....
The court held that petitioners should approach the jurisdictional Magistrate court for grievances when a final report has been filed, rather than seeking relief through writ petitions.
The court ruled that once a crime has been referred by police, no further writ intervention is warranted unless shown that justice requires such action.
The court clarified that if a final report is filed in a criminal investigation, aggrieved parties must seek redress through the appropriate jurisdictional court.
The court upheld the police's decision not to register an FIR based on preliminary enquiry findings, allowing petitioners to seek redress through the Magistrate if dissatisfied.
The court affirmed that serious investigation matters may warrant transfer to specialized agencies to ensure thorough and effective inquiries.
Black money transaction - seeking investigation - Orders have been issued by Deputy Inspector General of Police without ascertaining factual details, Petitioner has not made any verification about co....
The court upheld the transfer of specified FIRs to a Special Investigation Team for efficient investigation into deposit misappropriation allegations.
Court may dismiss writ petitions where no interference in ongoing investigations is deemed necessary.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.