SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 1957

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V.MENON
P. Vijayaraghavan – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.)
For the Respondent: SMT.THANUJA ROSHAN, SHRI.VIVEK A.V., SRI.M.S.AMAL DHARSAN SRI.M.VIVEK, SMT.KAVERY S. THAMPI, SRI.K.T.BOSCO

JUDGMENT :

HARISANKAR V. MENON, J.

[WP(C) Nos.32066/2018, 32061/2018, 32129/2018 & 32105/2018]

The issue arising for consideration in these writ petitions is with reference to the demand for service tax on the service provided by the lottery dealers/agencies.

2. Both sides admit that the issue has already been decided in favour of the petitioner/assessee by virtue of the judgment of the Apex Court in Union of India v. Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd. [2025 SCC OnLine SC 289] .

In the light of the above, these writ petitions would stand allowed, setting aside the impugned notices/assessment orders.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top