Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.Jayachandran
Sujith Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Its Secretary, Revenue Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial grievance and context surrounding land acquisition proceedings. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. submission of petitioners on procedural non-compliance regarding land valuation. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court analysis ruling on the necessity of procedural adherence within land acquisition. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. conclusive judgment and directive to the district collector regarding due process. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT :
C. Jayachandran, J.
The petitioners in both these Writ Petitions challenges the Land Acquisition proceedings, produced at Ext.P1 in W.P.(C) No.951/2025. The essential grievance of the petitioners in both these Writ Petitions is with respect to the proceedings produced at Ext.P3 in W.P.(C) No.951/2025 [Ext.P1 in W.P.(C) No.1548/2025], which reduced the value of the land by 80%, on the allegation that quarrying operations were conducted in such land entailing diminution of land value.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the procedure contemplated in the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 ('2013 Act', for short) has not been followed. Learned counsel
Procedural non-compliance in land acquisition violates the entitlement of affected persons to a hearing before re-evaluation of land value.
Personal hearing is a statutory requirement under Section 21(2) of the Act; failure to provide this violates natural justice and invalidates any acquisition award.
Compliance with statutory requirements for land acquisition is critical, but national interest may override individual objections when procedures are followed. The court upheld the legality of the ac....
The right to a personal hearing in land acquisition proceedings is fundamental, and failure to provide adequate notice and opportunity to be heard violates statutory requirements.
The acquisition process must comply with statutory provisions of timely final notification and personal hearing, failure of which undermines legal validity.
Land acquisition proceedings are invalid if statutory requirements are not met, particularly regarding notifications and timelines, as established by the Land Acquisition Act and the 2013 Act.
Point of law : In cases where facts can be said to be admitted or undisputable, and only one conclusion is possible, the court does not pass futile orders of setting aside or remand when there is, in....
Procedural lapses in land acquisition notification, hearing, and timelines vitiate proceedings, but completed construction and record loss warrant fresh award under original Act rather than new regim....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
