IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. Badharudeen,J
Joy P, S/o. Late Pappy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
The sole accused in S.C.No.787/2020 on the files of Special Court for the trial of offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (`POCSO Act’ for short), Ernakulam, has filed this Criminal Miscellaneous Case (`Crl.M.C’ for short) under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash Annexure A1 final report in the above case arising out of Crime No.611/2020 of Elamakkara Police Station, Ernakulam City.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the defacto complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the records placed along with this Crl.M.C and the case diary produced by the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. The prosecution case is that the accused with intention to sexually assault the minor girl victim, aged 9 years, so as to satisfy his lust, at about 15.30 hours on 14.10.2020 placed his head on the breast of the minor child and fondled on the chest. The further allegation is that he made attempt to touch on the vagina of the minor child by inserting his hands inside her panties. On the above premise, the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Section 9 (m) r/w 1
Serious offences under the POCSO Act cannot be compromised or settled; a prima facie case warrants a trial.
The court ruled that the allegations did not constitute sexual assault as defined under the PoCSO Act, emphasizing the lack of sexual intent in the accused's actions.
Serious offences under the PoCSO Act cannot be quashed based on victim's retraction, as they affect public interest and societal morals.
Serious offences under the POCSO Act cannot be settled; quashment based on settlement is impermissible due to public interest considerations.
Serious offences under the POCSO Act cannot be quashed based on settlements, as they affect public interest and the dignity of victims.
Serious offences under the POCSO Act cannot be quashed based on compromise or victim's affidavit, reaffirming the need for societal protection.
Quashing proceedings under POCSO Act is impermissible after evidence is recorded, especially in serious cases of sexual assault.
Allegations of sexual offences raised after significant delay post-marriage were found unsustainable, indicating potential misuse of the PoCSO Act.
The court established that while serious offences typically cannot be settled privately, the unique circumstances of marriage and children can justify quashing proceedings to protect family integrity....
The court ruled that serious offences under the POCSO Act, particularly sexual assault against minors, cannot be quashed based on victim retraction or compromise, emphasizing public interest in prose....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.