SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 1644

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
Shahada T.K. – Appellant
Versus
Habeebullah P.T. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SHAHADA T.K

ORDER :

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.

This writ petition is filed by Smt. Shahada T.K. as party-in-person. Hence she alone could be the Electronic-Filer (E-Filer). Since the name of another person - Sri. Asif Azad, was shown as having filed the case, on behalf of the petitioner, the Registry noted certain defects. Though the defects noted were attempted to be rectified since the E-Filer was not the petitioner, the following defect remained:

“While scrutiny of this W.P.Crl., it was noted that petitioner along with another party in person has moved this file. When a defect was noted, cause-title was corrected. But, name of the petitioner is not substituted so far, in docket and title of memorandum after cause-title.

Defect regarding wrong entry of party-in-person verification.

Details in the metadata also not cured”

2. When the above defect was made known to the petitioner, the following reply was given:

“1. There is no edit option for the docket and the cause tile but I change it in the index, As this petition have high red alert emergency as only 9 days remaining for the life of an innocent person who's passport has been stolen, so this writ petition is a connection to that, so post it as unnum

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top