Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S.
Sabarimala Special Duty Employees – Appellant
Versus
Travancore Devaswom Board – Respondent
ORDER :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
1. This DBP is registered based on Report No.13 of 2025 of the learned Ombudsman in Complaint No.18 of 2025 made by Sabarimala Special Duty Employees. The said report of the learned Ombudsman reads thus:
“The grievance of the complainant in this case is that there was no guidelines provided for posting employees at Nilakkal during festival season. Particular employees alone were given preference for such postings. If all the employees are posted at different places in Sabarimala so that they may be able to get allowance as in the case of other employees. Some guidelines will have to be framed for this purpose for which they approached the Ombudsman.
Devaswom Commissioner has filed report dated 18.02.2025 denying the allegations. However, on enquiry it was revealed from the Liaison Officer that in respect of complaints from Sabarimala, there is already a matter pending before the Honourable High Court as DBP No.116 of 2024 and the Ombudsman feels that it is proper to refer this matter also to the Honourable High Court to be considered along with DBP No.116 of 2024. Necessary directions, if any, required can be issued on the judicial side by the Honourable H
The existing provisions under the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act and previous court orders adequately govern staff deployment for special duties during festivals, limiting grounds....
The court ruled that complaints about deployment of Devaswom employees during festivals must be addressed through writ petitions, emphasizing adherence to existing judicial guidelines.
Point of Law : Mandala-Makaravilakku Festival of 1197 ME - Administration - to ensure that sufficient number of staff in the Establishment Wing of the Board and Class-IV employees are deployed for sp....
The Travancore Devaswom Board has a statutory duty to manage Devaswoms and must act on reports of misconduct, ensuring timely compliance with court directives.
The Ombudsman for Devaswom Boards is mandated to address public interest complaints regarding mismanagement, while personal grievances of employees must be resolved through appropriate legal channels....
‘Worshipper’ is a person who shows reverence and adoration for a deity - Right to worship is a civil right, of course in an accustomed manner and subject to the practise and tradition in each temple.
The Travancore Devaswom Board is obligated to ensure the uninterrupted performance of traditional rites and manage crowd safety during religious festivals, safeguarding the rights of worshippers.
The Cochin Devaswom Board must impose stringent penalties for misconduct by employees to uphold its fiduciary duties under the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act.
The Travancore Devaswom Board has a statutory duty to ensure proper facilities for devotees and manage temple affairs effectively, akin to trusteeship.
The Ombudsman for the Travancore Devaswom Board cannot entertain individual employee grievances regarding service matters; such issues must be raised in a writ petition under Article 226.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
