SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2094

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
Sabarimala Special Duty Employees - Appellant
Versus
Travancore Devaswom Board - Respondent
DBP No. 20 of 2025
Decided On : 28-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondents: S. Rajmohan, G. Biju, P. Ramamchandran

The existing provisions under the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act and previous court orders adequately govern staff deployment for special duties during festivals, limiting grounds for complaints.

Headnote:(A) Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 - Sections 1(3), 4, 15, 15A - Special Duty Employees at Sabarimala - The complaint regarding lack of guidelines for employee postings during festival seasons was addressed, confirming existing judicial directions govern such deployments - Employees must report for special duty or face disciplinary action - The Ombudsman’s report indicated a need for guidelines, however, existing orders were deemed sufficient. (Paras 3, 9, 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
A grievance was submitted by Sabarimala Special Duty Employees alleging lack of proper guidelines for staff postings during the festival season at Sabarimala; existing provisions of the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act were referenced.

Findings of Court:
The court reiterated that existing directions from previous orders govern staff deployments, addressing that complaints about postings should seek redress through writ jurisdiction under Article 226 if needed.

Issues: The key issue was whether the lack of guidelines for employee postings warranted action and the adequacy of existing orders regarding staff deployment during festivals.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that ongoing provisions adequately address staff deployment and that grievances should be elevated within the court's jurisdiction rather than through the Ombudsman.

Result: DBP disposed of with a record of the submissions by the Standing Counsel.

ORDER :

Anil K. Narendran, J.

1. This DBP is registered based on Report No.13 of 2025 of the learned Ombudsman in Complaint No.18 of 2025 made by Sabarimala Special Duty Employees. The said report of the learned Ombudsman reads thus:

“The grievance of the complainant in this case is that there was no guidelines provided for posting employees at Nilakkal during festival season. Particular employees alone were given preference for such postings. If all the employees are posted at different places in Sabarimala so that they may be able to get allowance as in the case of other employees. Some guidelines will have to be framed for this purpose for which they approached the Ombudsman.

Devaswom Commissioner has filed report dated 18.02.2025 denying the allegations. However, on enquiry it was revealed from the Liaison Officer that in respect of complaints from Sabarimala, there is already a matter pending before the Honourable High Court as DBP No.116 of 2024 and the Ombudsman feels that it is proper to refer this matter also to the Honourable High Court to be considered along with DBP No.116 of 2024. Necessary directions, if any, required can be issued on the judicial side by the Honourable High Court. Copy of the complaint is produced as Annexure 01 and the report of the Devaswom Commissioner is produced as Annexure 02.”

2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board for respondents 1 and 2, the learned Senior Government Pleader and also learned Amicus Curiae for the learned Ombudsman.

3. TRAVANCORE-COCHIN HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS ACT , 1950 enacted by the State Legislature makes provision for the administration, supervision and control of incorporated and unincorporated Devaswoms and of other Hindu Religious Endowments and Funds. As per sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Act, substituted by the Kerala Adaptation of Laws Order, 1956, Part I of the Act shall extend to Travancore, Part II of the Act shall extend to Cochin and Part III of the Act shall extend to the whole of the State of Kerala, excluding the Malabar District. Sabarimala Devaswom is an incorporated Devaswom mentioned in Schedule I of the Act, under Chengannur Group, Pathanamthitta Taluk.

4. Chapter II of the Act deals with Travancore Devaswom. Section 3 of the Act deals with vesting of administration in Board. Section 4 of the Act deals with constitution of the Travancore Devaswom Board. As per sub-section (2) of Section 4 , the Board shall be a body corporate having perpetual succession and a common seal with power to hold and acquire properties for and on behalf of the incorporated and unincorporated Devaswoms and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments under the management of the Board.

5. Section 15 of the Act deals with vesting of jurisdiction in the Board. As per sub-section (1) of Section 15 , subject to the provisions of Chapter III of Part I, all rights, authority and jurisdiction belonging to or exercised by the Ruler of Travancore prior to the first day of July, 1949, in respect of Devaswoms and Hindu Religious Endowments shall vest in and be exercised by the Board in accordance with the provisions of this Act. As per sub- section (2) of Section 15 , the Board shall exercise all powers of direction, control and supervision over the incorporated and unincorporated Devaswoms and Hindu Religious Endowments under their jurisdiction.

6. Section 15A of the Act, inserted by Act 5 of 2007, with effect from 12.04.2007, deals with duties of the Board. As per Section 15A, it shall be the duty of the Board to perform the following functions, namely, (i) to see that the regular traditional rites and ceremonies according to the practice prevalent in the religious institutions are performed promptly; (ii) to monitor whether the administrative officials and employees and also the employees connected with religious rites are functioning properly; (iii) to ensure proper maintenance and upliftment of the Hindu religious institutions; (iv) to establish and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top