IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Anil K.Narendran, Muralee Krishna S., JJ.
Sasi Kumar. C, - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Secretary, Education (General) And Ors. – Respondents
OP(KAT) NO. 334 OF 2025
Decided On : 22-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges tribunal order regarding vacancies. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner requests reporting and filling of vacancies. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. tribunal’s interim orders on vacancy reporting. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court directs reconsideration of the case. (Para 7 , 15) |
| 5. contradictions in responses highlight merit concerns. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
Muralee Krishna S., J.
This original petition is filed by the applicant in O.A.No.2290 of 2023 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Thiruvananthapuram, (‘the Tribunal’ for short), by invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 21.03.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
2. The petitioner is an Ex-Serviceman who suffered 30%disability while on duty. He belongs to Hindu Nadar Community. The petitioner was rank No.7 in Annexure A1 ranked list dated 04.03.2021 for the selection of High School Assistant (Social Science)-Tamil Medium in Idukki District, published by the 3rd respondent Kerala Public Service Commission (‘KPSC’ in short). Soon after the publication of Annexure A1 ranked list, O.A.No.805 of 2021 was filed before the Tribunal, which was finally ended in dismissal on 15.09.2023. The petitioner alleges that due to the pendency of the said original application, the Department was not keen on calculating and reporting the vacancies, and the vacancies arose then and there were managed by engaging temporary hands/guest teachers. After constant efforts, the petitioner got information that though the cadre strength is 25, only 18 teachers were appointed through KPSC, and out of which, many have obtained interdistrict/interdepartmental transfer, deputation and promotion, etc. The 2nd respondent is duty-bound to report at least 7 existing vacancies and remaining also after finding out the dearth. The petitioner states that even after the dismissal of O.A.No.805 of 2021, all vacancies in the 23 Schools, in which the post of High School Assistant (Social Science)-Tamil Medium are sanctioned, were not reported to the KPSC. According to the petitioner, although there are only 23 Schools, the cadre strength of the High School Assistant (Social Science)-Tamil Medium is 25, as two Schools, namely GVHS, Munnar, and PHSS, Vandipperiyar, have two posts each.
2.1. Before the Tribunal, the petitioner contended that the 2nd respondent has taken a wrong stand that the cadre strength is 23 and the vacancies available in the Department amount to 6, of which 3 are already reported to KPSC, but not advised due to non- availability of candidates in the respective turns. As per Annexure A3 letter dated 24.07.2023 received from the 2nd respondent, one of the three remaining vacancies has been reported to the KPSC, and one is set apart for by transfer appointment. Decision is yet to be taken regarding the remaining one post, which arose from 01.04.2023 due to retirement of the incumbent. The petitioner contended that as there are no eligible candidates for by transfer appointment, the said vacancy also has to be reported for direct recruitment. Another incumbent, Sri.Thankaraj, is working on deputation, and the said vacancy is not reported so far. When the actual cadre strength is considered as 25, the total number of vacancies to be reported is 8. By producing Annexure A4 appointment chart, the petitioner contended before the Tribunal that the last vacancy reported was on 30.03.2023, i.e., four months before Annexure A3 reply and it can be presumed that the single vacancy referred in Annexure A4, which the 1st respondent claims to have reported as a single one out of the three kept separately from the batch of 6. From Annexure A4, it can be seen that the 5th rank holder, namely Elizabeth Rani L., in the main list of Annexure A1 ranked list is advised in MR1-OC, and 3 turns are pending over including MR1 Hindu Nadar (on 18.04.2023). So even in the worst-case s
Arshitha P. and Others v. State of Kerala and Others
Director of Indian System of Medicine and Another v. Dr.Susmi C.T. and Another
Inconsistent reporting by the Department regarding job vacancies undermines fair appointment procedures, warranting judicial intervention and a re-evaluation of the original application.
Candidates included in a rank list have no indefeasible right to be appointed, and the state is not obligated to fill all vacancies. Candidates cannot claim a right to vacancies that are not reported....
The supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 cannot alter findings of lower tribunals without clear manifest errors, particularly regarding vacancy reporting tied to expired lists.
The court reinforced that candidates cannot compel filling vacancies from expired ranked lists, affirming appointing authorities' discretion over vacancy reporting under government policy.
The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 cannot replace the tribunal's findings unless there is manifest error or injustice.
The Tribunal's interim orders affecting public service vacancies must be based on a thorough evaluation of candidates' rights, ensuring lawful reporting of vacancies.
Judicial review under Article 227 is limited; interference occurs only in cases of grave dereliction or patent perversity.
State or any public agency, cannot be precluded from challenging a judgment on the ground that it approaches this court, filing an appeal against only one party – Even if in that case, normative basi....
NJD vacancies arising after the expiry of a ranked list cannot be filled using the expired list.
Point of Law : Recruitment over and above notified vacancies is not in accordance with constitutional mandate of equal opportunity of unemployment, envisaged in Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.