SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2422

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P.V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ.
Devidas C. S/o Achuthankutty Menon - Appellant
Versus
Cochin Devaswom Board - Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 35495 of 2024
Decided On : 23-05-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : T. Sanjay, Ardhra Krishna, Sreekanth G. Menon, Sanil Kumar G.
For the Respondents: K.P. Sudheer, Dinesh R. Shenoy, Suvin R. Menon, Joy Thattil Ittoop, Bijish B. Tom, Jacob Tomlin Varghese, Baby Sonia, Uthara A.S., Nevis Cassandra L. Caxton Loretta, Karun Mahesh, K.S. Arun Kumar, Krishna Kumar T.K.

The court established that the Cochin Devaswom Board must protect temple funds and properties, ensuring proper management and preventing exploitation through unauthorized online platforms.

Headnote:(A) Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 - Sections 62, 62A, 68, 73A, 76A - Writ petition filed by devotees seeking audit of donations and regulation of temple activities - Court directed the Cochin Devaswom Board to ensure proper management of temple funds and prevent exploitation through fake accounts. (Paras 1, 39)

(B) Temple Advisory Committees - The role of Temple Advisory Committees is to assist the Board in discharging its functions, and any improper act by trustees can be questioned by worshippers. (Paras 33, 37)

(C) Online Donations - The court emphasized the need for vigilance against exploitation of devotees through unauthorized online platforms. (Paras 39)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, devotees of Sree Poornathrayeesa Temple, sought court intervention to declare donations as Devaswom Funds, demand audits, and regulate temple activities including online donations and festival management.

Findings of Court:
The court ordered the Cochin Devaswom Board to ensure no exploitation occurs through fake accounts and mandated the exhibition of official online facilities at the temple.

Issues: The main issues were the management of donations, the need for audits, and the regulation of unauthorized online activities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Board must act as a trustee to protect temple properties and funds, ensuring proper management and preventing exploitation.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directives to the Cochin Devaswom Board.

JUDGMENT :

Anil K. Narendran, J.

1. The petitioners, who are devotees of Lord Poornathrayeesa of Sree Poornathrayeesa Temple, Tripunithura, which is a temple under the management of the 1st respondent Cochin Devaswom Board, subject to the restrictions in sub-section (2) of Section 62 of the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950, are before this Court in this writ petition seeking a declaration that the entire amounts obtained as donations in connection with Vrishchikoltsavam of Lord Poornathrayeesa are Devaswom Funds and be subjected to a thorough audit by the State Audit Department or any other organisation or person under the direct supervision of this Court. The petitioners have also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent Cochin Devaswom Board to take immediate steps to account the income and expenses of the Temple Advisory Committees of the previous eight years, by the State Audit Department, or any other organization or person under the direct supervision of this Court; a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 and 7 to take immediate action to take-down the various fake ‘official’ Instagram or social media accounts in the name of Sree Poornathrayeesa Temple and other temples under the management of the Board and take action against persons responsible; a writ of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent Board to have videography of the collection and counting of the hundis by the officials of the Board and prepare an inventory/ register of the gold, jewels, precious stones and other material offered by the devotees and publish the same periodically; a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 3 to keep at least 100 meters radius around Sree Poornathrayeesa Temple and other temples under its management, free from temporary shops and bunks during temple festivals, to enable emergency vehicles like ambulances and fire engines to have proper access; a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 3 and 7 to station ambulances, fire engines and teams of SDRF/NDRF at the entrance of Sree Poornathrayeesa Temple to enable swift rescue, in case of any untoward incident, since thousands of devotees are jostling for space when 15 elephants are paraded during the annual festival of Sree Poornathrayeesa Temple; a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 3 to ensure that the contracts for the programmes in connection with the annual festival, light and sound, elephants, percussionists etc., are awarded only after calling for tenders; a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 3 to provide prasadams like Pantheerazhi payasam in the exact proportion for which the offering has been made and to prohibit sale of payasam without taking proper receipt from the Devaswom Office; a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 3 to induct volunteers for the conduct of temple festivals only as per the specific directions contained in the order of this Court in DBP No.5 of 2021; a writ of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent Cochin Devaswom Board to take proactive steps to utilize various schemes like PRASHAD Scheme to get technical and financial assistance from the 9th respondent Central Government; a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 3 not to initiate any major renovation/reconstruction/demolishing of the temples and its properties managed by it without publishing an approved Master Plan for that temples; and a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 3 not to induct executive committee members of the defunct Temple Advisory Committees, as volunteers for the conduct of temple festival, for at least 10 years after the expiry of their tenure.

2. On 14.10.2024, when this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out Ext.P1 screenshot of an Instagram Account ‘Sree Poornathrayeesa Kshethram’ created in the year 2022. The learned Standing Counsel for Cochin Devaswom Board, on instructions, submitted that the said Instagram Account is being

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top