SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 1641

N THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ.
K.K. Murukan and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Travancore Devaswom Board – TDB, Represented By Its Secretary, Kawdiar Post, Nanthencode, Thiruvananthapuram and Ors. – Respondents
DBP NO. 77 Of 2023, WP(C) No. 29355 Of 2024
Decided On : 15-10-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Krishna Raj, E.S. Soni, Resmi A., Sreeragh C.R.
For the Respondents: G. Biju, Kumari Sangeetha S. Nair.
Other Present : Sri. S. Rajmohan, SR. GP; Sri. G. Biju, SC, TDB; Sri. P. Ramachandran, Amicus Curiae.

The Travancore Devaswom Board must ensure proper maintenance of temples, and the Temple Advisory Committee is authorized to collect funds for renovations under strict compliance with statutory procedures.

Headnote:(A) Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 - Sections 15A, 24, 27, 31, 31A - Reconstruction of Vilakkumadam in Peruvaram Sree Mahadeva Temple - The court examined the necessity for reconstruction based on the Ombudsman's report and the financial implications involved. The Travancore Devaswom Board is mandated to ensure proper maintenance and administration of temples. The court directed that the renovation work be undertaken by the Temple Advisory Committee with funds collected through sealed coupons, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements. (Paras 9, 10, 11, 12, 19, 45, 47)

(B) Temple Advisory Committee - The court emphasized the role of the Temple Advisory Committee in managing temple renovations and the necessity of obtaining prior approval from the Travancore Devaswom Board for fund collection and expenditure. (Paras 19, 45)

Facts of the case:
The case involves the reconstruction of Vilakkumadam at Peruvaram Sree Mahadeva Temple, with a significant estimated cost of Rs. 77,41,000. The Temple Advisory Committee sought permission to collect funds for the renovation due to the deteriorating condition of the structure.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the wooden structure of Vilakkumadam did not have significant damages, and only the provision of brass lamps was necessary. The court directed the Temple Advisory Committee to collect funds for the renovation under the supervision of the Travancore Devaswom Board.

Issues: The main issues included the necessity of reconstruction, the role of the Temple Advisory Committee, and the procedures for fund collection.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Travancore Devaswom Board has a statutory duty to manage temple properties and ensure proper maintenance, and the Temple Advisory Committee must follow prescribed procedures for fund collection and renovation work.

Result: The DBP and writ petition are disposed of with directions.

JUDGMENT :

(Anil K. Narendran, J.)

The issue involved in DBP No.77 of 2023 and W.P(C)No.29355 of 2024 relates to the reconstruction of Vilakkumadam in Peruvaram Sree Mahadeva Temple (Peruvaram Devaswom), which is an ancient temple under the management of the Travancore Devaswom Board.

2. DBP No.77 of 2023 is registered based on report No.27 of 2023 of the learned Ombudsman in Complaint No.88 of 2023 made by the complainants regarding the reconstruction of Vilakkumadam in Peruvaram Devaswom. The issue that requires consideration in this DBP is as to whether the Vilakkumadam of Peruvaram Sree Mahadeva Temple requires reconstruction. In the report, the learned Ombudsman noticed that the expenditure to be incurred being huge, the appropriate course of action is to file a maramath petition before this Court, so that the necessity of the work can also be examined by this Court and appropriate direction can be given.

2.1. On 18.08.2023, when this DBP came up for consideration, this Court issued various directions regarding the filing of reports by the learned Ombudsman. The directions are contained in the order dated 18.08.2023 read thus:

    (i) When a report of the learned Ombudsman is filed, the office of the learned Ombudsman shall ensure that a complete copy of the report with index and all its enclosures are furnished in the office of the learned Advocate General, the learned Standing Counsel for the Devaswom Board concerned, the learned Amicus Curiae for the learned Ombudsman and if there is any other official respondents, Standing Counsel of such respondents;

    (ii) Once the report is numbered as a DBP and the cause title is generated, the docket of the file printed on A4 size paper shall be collected from the Registry and copies thereof shall be served on the Government Pleader/Standing Counsel/Amicus Curiae by the official from the office of the learned Ombudsman;

2.2. On 22.08.2023, when this DBP came up for consideration, this Court issued notice to the complainants by speed post, returnable within three weeks. The learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board was directed to get instructions.

2.3. By the order dated 26.09.2023, the State of Kerala, represented by the Secretary to Government, Revenue (Devaswom) Department and the Deputy Director, Local Fund Audit, Travancore Devaswom Board Audit were suo motu impleaded as additional respondents 5 and 6 and the learned Senior Government Pleader entered appearance for the said respondents. In the order dated 26.09.2023, this Court noticed that the construction in question is repair work of Vilakkumadam in Peruvaram Devaswom. As per Annexure O2 report of the 2nd respondent Devaswom Commissioner in Annexure O1 complaint made by the complainants, it is stated that the estimate for the said work is Rs.87,33,750/-. In case such a work is undertaken directly by the Travancore Devaswom Board utilising the Devaswom fund, the Board has to file a maramath petition for sanction, which has to be placed before this Court, along with the report of the learned Ombudsman, since the estimated amount is more than Rs.20,00,000/-. The submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board is that such a procedure is not followed in case the construction work is undertaken either through sponsorship or by collection of funds through the Temple Advisory Committee, by issuing sealed coupons. In the order dated 26.09.2023, it was made clear that in the affidavit being filed by the Board, the procedure being followed in undertaking construction through different modes shall also be explained.

3. W.P.(C)No.29355 of 2023 is filed by the petitioner, who is a devotee of Lord Sree Mahadeva of Peruvaram Sree Mahadeva Temple, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2nd respondent the Travancore Devaswom Board to immediately grant permission for the renovation of the Vilakkumadam/Vilakkazhi of P

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top