Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.Manu
Smitha Francis Alias Smitha Ajay – Appellant
Versus
Shwas Homes Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. denial of employment and labour court award. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. counterarguments regarding petitioner's business income. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments for and against relief under section 17b. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. interpretation of employment in section 17b. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. self-employment as employment under section 17b. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
ORDER :
S.MANU, J.
This interim application has been filed by the 2nd respondent in the writ petition under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act.
2. Petitioner in this I.A. is the workman in I.D.No.14/2017 of the Labour Court, Ernakulam. Denial of employment by the writ petitioner was the issue. On 07.03.2022, the Labour Court passed an award finding that the denial of employment was unjustified and illegal. Petitioner was directed to be reinstated with continuity of service. 50% of backwages with 7% interest from 17.09.2011 was also awarded.
3. The writ petitioner management did not honour the award. Petitioner filed C.P.No.77/2022 under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act before the Labour Court. Later, she filed C.P.No.51/2023 which was allowed by order dated 29.11.2023. The Labour Court held that the petiti
Self-employment constitutes 'employment' under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, and relief can be denied if self-employment proves sufficient income.
Self-employment is classified as gainful employment under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, denying relief to those not in destitution.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a workman is entitled to full wages last drawn during the pendency of proceedings in h....
Point of law: No necessity to decide as to whether the concept of gainful employment by way of self employment, would also partake within the ingredients of Sec.i7-B of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Payment of wages under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is mandatory during legal proceedings, unless the employer proves the workman’s alternative employment.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the social welfare aspect of the Industrial Disputes Act and the criteria for denying relief to the workman under Section 17B.
The onus of proving that the workman is gainfully employed is on the employer, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the court may dismiss the appeal.
The court affirmed that under Section 17B, an employee challenging termination is entitled to full wages during litigation unless the employer proves otherwise, ensuring protection against financial ....
Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act ensures workmen receive relief without discrimination against temporary workers, emphasizing protection and support during employment disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
