SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Surender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal disposed on terms outlined. (Para 1 , 7)
2. application under section 17-b pending. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. no reply filed; judge to consider implications. (Para 5)
4. financial support for appellant granted. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (ORAL):

CM APPL. 33281/2021

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

LPA 341/2021 and CM APPL. 33280/2021 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant for interim relief]

2. This appeal is directed against an interlocutory order dated 03.09.2021, passed by the learned single Judge in the application filed by the appellant/workman, under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [in short, "the Act"].

3. Ms. Meghna De, who appears on behalf of the appellant/workman, says that, the appellant/workman is aggrieved by the fact that, his application under Section 17-B of the Act has not been decided, although, notice in the application was issued, as far back on 03.12.2020.

4. A perusal of the impugned order dated 03.09.2021 shows that, the application i.e., CM Appl. 31264/2020, preferred by the appellant/workman, under Section 17-B of the Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top