Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.Pratheep Kumar
Ussan Sahib, S/O Khadar Sahib – Appellant
Versus
Muhammed Sanooj, S/O Late Noormuhammed – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C. Pratheep Kumar, J.
The plaintiff in OS 60/2004 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Palakkad, is the appellant. (For the purpose of convenience, the parties are hereafter referred to as per their rank before the trial court.)
2. The plaintiff filed the above suit for specific performance of Ext.A1 agreement for sale dated 14.10.2003 executed by him along with defendants 1 to 5. According to the plaintiff, as per Ext.A1, the defendants agreed to sell an extent of 10 cents of property covered by settlement deed 1802/1992 of SRO Alathur (Ext.A2), for a consideration of Rs.45,000/- per cent. On the date of agreement itself, a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- was paid as advance and the possession of the scheduled property was handed over to the plaintiff. The period originally fixed for specific performance was upto 14.2.2004 and subsequently, it was extended till 28.2.2004, as per endorsement dated 30.1.2004. According to the plaintiff, though he was always ready and willing to perform his part of the contract, it could not be performed due to the default of the defendants. On 24.2.2004 a lawyers notice was issued to the defendants calling upon them to execute the sale deed after r
Non-registration of a sale agreement does not bar specific performance under the Registration Act if it meets conditions outlined in Section 49.
Non-registration of an agreement does not bar a claim for specific performance, as unregistered documents can be evidence in such suits under the Registration Act.
A sale agreement, despite being unregistered, can be the basis for an order of specific performance under the Registration Act, as legislative provisions exempt such cases from strict registration re....
An unregistered sale agreement can still be used to seek specific performance despite non-registration due to exceptions allowed under the law.
A suit for specific performance necessitates the plaintiff's readiness to fulfill obligations, while unregistered documents cannot substantiate ownership rights unless properly admitted as evidence.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for registration of a sale agreement under the Registration Act, 1908, for invoking specific performance, and the significance o....
(1) Registration of document is not sine qua non for receiving the same as evidence of a contract in a suit for specific performance.(2) Plaintiff can very well make alternative prayer in a suit for ....
An unregistered document can be admitted as evidence in a suit for specific performance to show a contract between the parties, and the plaintiff's continuous readiness and willingness to perform the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
