SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2736

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.BADHARUDEEN
V.J. Kurian, S/o. V.J. Joseph – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. Thomas J.Anakkallunkal, Shri. Jayaraman S., Shri. Nirmal Cheriyan Varghese, Smt. Litty Peter, Smt. Anupa Anna Jose Kandoth, Sri. P. Vijaya Bhanu (Sr.).
For the Respondents: Shri. Dinoop P.D., Sri. K.P. Prasanth, Smt. T.S. Krishnendu, Smt. Archana Suresh, Smt. Sunitha K.G., Sri. C. Unnikrishnan (Kollam), Shri. Ananda Padmanabhan, Smt. Uthara A.S, Shri. Goutham Krishna U.B., Sri. Nidhi Balachandran, Shri Vijaykrishnan S. Menon, Sri. Rajesh A, Special Public Prosecutor, Vacb, Smt. Rekha S, Senior Public Prosecutor, Vacb.

Table of Content
1. quick verification ordered based on new allegations against the petitioner. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. court observations regarding the necessity and process of the verification. (Para 2 , 6 , 8)
3. need for prior approval for conducting inquiries was discussed. (Para 5 , 9)
4. discussion on the benami transactions and related legislative provisions. (Para 10 , 12 , 14)
5. constitutional powers and requirements for fir registration delineated. (Para 11 , 19 , 20)
6. final order of dismissal of the application and vacating of interim stay. (Para 22 , 26)

ORDER :

A. BADHARUDEEN, J.

This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash Annexure A2 order dated 18.01.2023 in CMP No.300/2020 passed by the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge (Vigilance), Muvattupuzha. The petitioner herein is the 1st respondent in the above case.

2. Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner/ 1st respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail. Perused the relevant records. Even though the learned counsel for the proposed additional 3rd respondent also appeared to support the order, the impleading petition filed by the add

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top