ANIRUDDHA BOSE, BELA M. TRIVEDI
Nara Chandrababu Naidu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant is aggrieved by initiation of a criminal proceeding against him and his detention in connection with the same by the respondent State through its CID. Allegations have been made against him for commission of offences under Sections 166, 167, 418, 420, 465, 468, 471, 409, 209 and 109 read with Sections 120B, 34 and 37 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 12 and 13(2) read with Sections 13(1)(c) and (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The said offences are alleged to have been committed between the years 2015 and 2019, during which period he was the Chief Minister of the State of Andhra Pradesh. Initially, a First Information Report dated 09.12.2021 was lodged with CID Police Station, Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri implicating twenty-six persons as accused. On that basis, CR No. 29/2021 was registered. The appellant was not included in the array of accused persons in that F.I.R. The offences primarily relate to siphoning of public funds and I shall refer broadly to the allegations forming the basis of the F.I.R. in the succeeding paragraphs of this judgment. The list of accused persons was subsequently expand
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Paras Nath Singh
Shambhoo Nath Misra vs. State of U.P. and Others
Dr. S.M. Mansoori (Dead) through Legal Representatives vs. Surekha Parmar and Others
State of Telangana vs. Managipet alias Mangipet Sarveshwar Reddy
Vinod Kumar Garg vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Anant Gopal Sheorey vs. State of Bombay
Rattan Lal vs. State of Punjab
State of Rajasthan vs. Tejmal Choudhary
State of Telangana vs. Managipet alias Mangipet Sarveshwar Reddy
Yashwant Sinha and Others vs. Central Bureau of Investigation through its Director and Another
Rameshbhai Dabhai Naika vs. State of Gurajat and Others
Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra
R.P. Kapur vs. State of Punjab
State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal
Mahmood Ali and Others vs. State of U.P. 2023 INSC 684 [Para 27] – Referred.
Ebha Arjun Jadeja and Others vs. State of Gujarat
State through Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi vs. Jitender Kumar Singh
Chiranjilal Goenka vs. Jasjit Singh and Others
State of Tamil Nadu vs. Paramasiva Pandian
State of Punjab vs. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar
Kaushik Chaterjee vs. State of Haryana
A. Sreenivasa Reddy vs. Rakesh Sharma and Another
Vivek Gupta vs. Central Bureau Investigation and Another
Yashwant Sinha & Ors. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Anant Gopal Sheorey vs. State of Bombay
Rattan Lal Alias Ram Rattan Vs. State of Punjab
State of Punjab vs. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar & Others
R.P. Kapur vs. State of Punjab
State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal
State of Rajasthan vs. Tejmal Choudhary, 2021 SCC Online SC 3477 [Para 9
G.J. Raja vs. Tejraj Surana, (2019) 9 SCC 469 [Para 9
S. Gopal Reddy Vs. State of A.P.; 1996 (4) SCC 596 [Para 12] – Referred.
Indian Handicrafts Emporium & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; 2003 (7) SCC 589 [Para 12] – Referred.
R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalla & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Anr; AIR 1957 SC 628. 67 [Para 12] – Referred.
Vineeta Sharma vs. Rakesh Sharma and Others
Darshan Singh v. Ram Pal Singh
Mr Sachar relies on Gokal Chand v. Parvin Kumari
Garikapati Veeraya v. N. Subbiah Choudhry
Jose Da Costa v. Bascora Sadasiva Sinai Narcornim
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur and Others vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
State of Telangana vs. Managipet @ Mangipet Sarveshwar Reddy
Subramanian Swamy vs. Manmohan Singh and Another
Subramanian Swamy vs. Director, Central Bureau of Investigation and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.