IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AMIT RAWAL, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ.
Manual Mathew, S/o Mathew – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Registrar (General) – Respondent
WA Nos.185 of 2025, 454 of 2025, 544 of 2025, 512 of 2025, 561 of 2025, 569 of 2025, 570 of 2025, 605 of 2025, 721 of 2025, 1324 of 2025, 1241 of 2025, 1433 of 2025, 1983 of 2025, 1808 of 2025, 1809 of 2025, 1818 of 2025, 1839 of 2025, 1841 of 2025, 1847 of 2025, 1928 of 2025, 1857 of 2025, 1858 of 2025, 1865 of 2025, 1919 of 2025, 1935 of 2025, 1936 of 2025, 1937 of 2025, 1948 of 2025, 1951 of 2025, 1952 of 2025, 1953 of 2025, 1954 of 2025, 1958 of 2025, 1959 of 2025, 1985 of 2025, 2012 of 2025, 2106 of 2025, 1845 of 2024, 2028 of 2024, 2045 of 2024, 2070 of 2024, 141 of 2025
Decided on : 12-09-2025
Based on the provided legal document, here are the key points summarized:
The court disposed of multiple writ appeals filed by fixed depositors against the inaction of cooperative societies in refunding fixed deposits, highlighting systemic issues of mismanagement and fraud within cooperative banks (!) (!) .
The court emphasized the importance of employing statutory schemes such as the Kerala Co-operative Revival Fund Scheme, 2024, and the Kerala Co-operative Deposit Guarantee Scheme, 2018, to ensure depositors' funds are protected and to facilitate the recovery of dues (!) (!) .
It was directed that cooperative banks must prepare revival schemes and submit them for approval within specified timeframes, enabling them to discharge liabilities to depositors effectively (!) (!) (!) .
The court underscored the necessity for proper financial monitoring and accountability, especially in cases involving allegations of mismanagement, embezzlement, and fraudulent activities, including large-scale scams and irregular loan practices (!) (!) (!) .
Directions were issued for the appointment of sales officers to recover dues, with provisions for safeguarding assets and ensuring equitable distribution of recovered amounts to depositors, considering their age and claims (!) (!) (!) .
The court addressed issues of illegal schemes such as unregistered chit funds operating under the guise of cooperative schemes, which result in significant revenue loss due to tax evasion (!) (!) .
It was mandated that cooperative societies and non-urban banks must register with GST, pay applicable fees, and refrain from extending deposit validity unilaterally without depositor consent (!) (!) .
The court recognized the amendments introduced to the cooperative laws, including provisions for creating charges on assets in favor of the Kerala State Co-operative Bank or other credit societies, which are applicable retrospectively (!) (!) .
A directive was issued for the immediate disbursement of permissible amounts to depositors under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes, with a further requirement for cooperative societies to pay additional sums within a specified period (!) (!) .
Overall, the court dismissed appeals where full disbursement had already been made, while other appeals were disposed of with directions aimed at expediting recovery, safeguarding assets, and protecting depositors’ interests (!) .
These points reflect the court’s focus on ensuring financial accountability, protecting depositors, and enforcing statutory schemes to address the challenges faced by cooperative banks due to mismanagement, fraud, and legal violations.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court disposes multiple writ appeals related to depositors. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion of co-operative schemes enhancing solutions for depositors. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. emphasis on recovery challenges faced by co-operative banks. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. guidelines on financial schemes and obligations highlighted. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. directives aimed at improving financial accountability and compliance. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. mandated actions for timely restitution to depositors. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. final conclusions on dismissal of specific writ appeals. (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT :
Amit Rawal, J.
This order shall dispose of 42 writ appeals preferred by the writ petitioners/fixed depositors aggrieved of the inaction on the part of the Co-operative Societies, who have been taking the deposits in the shape of FD by levying an extra amount of interest than the Nationalized Bank and on failure to discharge the duty, resulted into the multifariousness of litigation and dismissal of the same by the learned Single Bench on the ground that as per Section 57E of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, the government has come out with a statutory deposit scheme, where the societies are required to contribute. The amount due to the writ petitioners is not a paltry amount but exponential.
2. Aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Single Bench relegating the writ petitioners to avail the remedy of the deposit scheme, writ appeals have come up for adjudication. Since numerous writ appeals had come up, W.A.No.185 of 2025 was kept as the lead case, though it is pertinent to mention here that the amount due to the writ petitioner in this case from the concerned Co-operative Society has already been discharged, but the matter as per the order dated 23.08.2025 was kept pending as having been treated as the lead case.
3. While issuing notice on 29.01.2025, we had restrained the Societies from creating the third-party rights over the properties. In other words, had attached the properties owned to the society, considering the plight of the depositors who are not only senior citizens and general depositors who have deposited their hard-earned money to earn a little more interest than the National Bank, particular when a few of them are cancer patients and suffering from other various serious ailments. Before issuing the notice, on 17.01.2025, we had appointed Adv.D.Kishore as an Amicus Curie to render assistance to us.
4. The pith and substance of the judgment under challenge disposing of the writ petition has been on account of the fact that the government had come out with two schemes. One is Kerala Co-operative Revival Fund Scheme, 2024 and the other is Kerala Co-operative Deposit Guarantee Scheme, 2018. Paragraphs 8 to 11 of the judgment noticing the aforementioned schemes and the directions contained in the judgment under challenge are extracted herein below;
8. Paragraph 4 of the Kerala Co-operative Revival Fund Scheme, 2024 reads as follows:
4. Terms and Conditions for providing financial assistance -
(1) A Co-operative Society registered under the Act shall be eligible to be considered for the benefits under this Scheme.
(2) When a Society’s operations has become sluggish due to operational inefficiencies, lack of working capital and short-term liquidity issues, it shall formulate a revival scheme.
(3) Only those Co-operative Societies that are weaker or remain dormant but viable and capable of gaining strength shall be considered for revival.
(4) In addition to the financial assistance that may be provided from the Scheme, societies facing crisis are also eligible to utilize any reserve funds they have accumulated, subject to conditions if any specified by the Registrar.
(5) The amount sanctioned under the Scheme shall be granted a moratorium on repayment for the first two years. The repayment period ranges from five to ten years. The State High Level Committee shall be competent to determine the instalment structure and interest r
The court reinforced that cooperative banks must adhere to statutory schemes to refund fixed depositors while establishing a framework for recovering debts and ensuring compliance with financial regu....
The Government's circulars regarding debt relief were quashed as ultra vires the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, confirming the Registrar's powers must respect contractual agreements.
The court emphasized expedited recovery proceedings under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act for repayment of matured deposits.
Disputes under Kerala Co-operative Societies Act must be resolved through proper administrative channels as prescribed therein.
The court enabled the petitioner to repay a loan default in instalments under specified conditions, balancing creditor rights with debtor relief.
Liability under Section 68(1) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act must be fixed individually, not jointly, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions.
The court declared Section 28(2A) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 unconstitutional for violating democratic control and autonomy principles, affirming the right to form associations un....
The court affirmed the availability of multiple recovery modes for executing awards under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969.
Court confirms right of the petitioner to adjudicate disputes under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 in prompt manner.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.