IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
Dr. Geetha R, D/o Gangadharan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
OP(KAT) No.372 of 2025
Decided on : 11-09-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for retaining position. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. court proceedings and petitioner’s appeal. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. supervisory jurisdiction under article 227. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. petition dismissed but with a right to challenge. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner filed O.A.No.1446 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal at Thiruvananthapuram, invoking the provisions under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking an order to set aside Annexure A1 order dated 11.08.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent Director of Health Services; an order directing the respondents to retain her in the present station, i.e., Family Health Centre, Kadakampally, Thiruvananthapuram; or in the alternative to direct the respondents to accommodate her in the open vacancy at Integrated Health Centre, Pangappara, Thiruvananthapuram. The said original application filed by the petitioner-applicant, who is working as Assistant Surgeon at Primary Health Centre, Kadakampally, Thiruvananthapuram, was disposed of by Ext.P2 order dated 20.08.2025 of the Tribunal. Paragraphs 2, 3 and also the last paragraph of that order read thus;
“2. Annexure A1 transfer order would show that the said order is issued in the light of a complaint followed by the preliminary inquiry. The applicant's contention is that she had submitted a complaint against one of the office staff to the 3rd respondent as well as before the state SC/ST Commission. The said transfer order, the applicant contends, is a counter to the said complaint. Aggrieved by the transfer, the applicant has submitted Annexure A5 appeal before, the 1st respondent.
3. On instructions, the learned Government Pleader submits that the applicant can be considered against any of the vacancies available at the Family Health Center, Madavoor, Taluk Headquarters Hospital, Varkala or at the Taluk Hospital, Attingal.
The submission made by the learned Government Pleader is recorded and the Original Application is disposed.”
2. Feeling aggrieved by Ext.P2 order dated 20.08.2025 of the Tribunal in O.A.No.1446 of 2025, the petitioner-applicant has filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking an order to set aside Ext.P1 order of transfer dated 11.08.2025 and Ext.P2 order dated 20.08.2025 of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.1446 of 2025; to direct the respondents to retain the petitioner-applicant in Primary Health Centre, Kadakampally, by cancelling Ext.P1 transfer order, and permit her to continue in the present station till her retirement; and an order directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 representation dated 23.08.2025, after hearing the petitioner-applicant and also to take a decision on Exts.P4 to P6 complaints.
3. On 03.09.2025, when this original petition came up for admission before the Vacation Bench, the learned Government Pleader was directed to get instructions from the respondents. While ordering the original petition to be listed on 08.09.2025, the Division Bench ordered that until such time, status quo available as on 03.09.2025 at 10.45 a.m., with respect to the position of the petitioner-applicant, shall be maintained. Thereafter, when this original petition came up for consideration on the re-opening day, it was adjourned to 10.09.2025 and thereafter to this date (11.09.2025), at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant.
4. The petitioner has filed I.A.No.1 of 2025 seeking an order to implead the complainant referred to in Annexure A1 order dated 11.08.2025 of the Director of Health Services, as additional 4th respondent in this original petition.
5. Heard arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant and the learned Senior Government Pleader for the respondents.
6. During the course of arguments, the learned Senior Government Pleader would point
Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil
Jai Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited and does not extend to converting a tribunal's decision into an appeal; it can only intervene in cases of grave dereliction of d....
The High Court under Article 227 exercises supervisory jurisdiction and cannot correct lower tribunal errors without clear evidence of fundamental principles of law being violated.
Pension eligibility is governed by prevailing conditions at the time of appointment, and service conditions may change. The court's supervisory jurisdiction does not allow review of all errors in tri....
The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 does not allow interference unless there is a manifest error or flagrant abuse of justice by the Administrative Tribunal.
Administrative transfers cannot be interfered with unless proved arbitrary or mala fide, upholding principles of administrative discretion.
The High Court maintains limited supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, primarily to address grave derelictions from subordinate tribunals and not to substitute its own decisions on administrati....
High Court permitted withdrawal of petition under Article 227 without prejudice due to drafting errors, allowing fresh filing.
The High Court upheld the Administrative Tribunal’s dismissal of a seniority challenge, affirming that tribunals operate within their jurisdiction unless manifest errors occur.
The supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 allows intervention only in cases of patent error or injustice, not for correcting all Tribunal errors.
An original petition filed to seek interim relief from a tribunal becomes infructuous and is liable to be dismissed once the tribunal has already passed the necessary interim orders during the penden....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.