IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
Vellangallur Peoples Welfare Co-Operative Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India, Represented By Its Secretary To The Government, Ministry Of Finance – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J.
In all these cases, the petitioners are Co-operative Societies registered under the provisions of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 and are classified as Primary Agricultural Credit Societies under the said Act and the Rules. In all these cases, the challenge is raised against the Constitutional validity of the proviso to section 194A(3) of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), by which, a restriction was imposed, based on the gross receipts or turnover of the Societies, in the matter of exemption from the obligation to make TDS from the income as the interests on deposits.
2. The brief facts which are required to examine the issues involved in these writ petitions are as follows: As mentioned above, all these petitioners are Primary Agricultural Credit Societies, which are mainly engaged in the business of providing financial assistance to their members, for agricultural purposes. Section 194A deals with the liability to make deduction of tax at source (TDS) in respect of certain transactions and sub-section (1) thereof imposes a liability upon any person not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, to ded
Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. v. Smt.P. Laxmi Devi
K.T.Moopil Nair v. State of Kerala and Anr.
Shayara Bano v. Union of India and Ors.
Union of India & Anr. v. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt Ltd.
The Commissioner of Income Tax,New Delhi v. Eli Lilly and Company (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Swedish Match AB and Another v. Securities and Exchange Board and Another
Dwaraka Prasad v Dwaraka Das Saraf
Commissioner of Income Taxes v. Ramkishan Shrikishan Jhaver and others.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.