Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Nitin Jamdar, Basant Balaji
Kerala High Court Advocates Association (Khcaa) – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram, Represented By Its Chief Secretary – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
Nitin Jamdar, C. J.
Through this Public Interest Litigation, the Kerala High Court Advocates’ Association challenges the amendment to the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959, introduced by Section 2 of the Kerala Finance Act, 2025. The Mavelikara Bar Association and the Trivandrum Bar Association have joined as intervenors supporting this challenge.
2. Earlier, the levy of court fees and the valuation of suits in the region were governed by the Madras Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, the Travancore-Cochin Court-Fees Act, 1125, and the Travancore- Cochin Suits Valuation Act, 1125. To ensure uniformity across the entire State, it was considered necessary to enact a common law, and accordingly, the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1959’) came into force on 1 February 1962.
3. The Act of 1959 comprises nine chapters. Chapter I sets out the definitions and the applicability of the Act. Chapter II relates to the liability to pay court fees, while Chapter III provides for the determinat
The court ruled that legislative revisions to court fees under the Kerala Finance Act, 2025, are constitutionally valid, reflecting economic necessity and not infringing citizens' right to access jus....
A court must address court fee sufficiency before evaluating the merits of a claim, per statutory provisions preventing post-evidence challenges.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Sec. 52 of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1955, and its application to appeals arising from suits filed be....
Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) – Refund of court fees – Section 89 CPC nowhere correlates settlement of disputes by alternate mechanisms to amount of money that may be saved by parties in so far ....
Amendments to court fee provisions under the KCF & SV Act necessitate compliance for complaints under Section 138 of the NI Act, irrespective of the petitioner’s financial status.
Human Rights Protection Forum v. State of Kerala
-
Read summaryCollector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Mst. Katiji and Others
-
Read summarySecretary to Government of Madras and Another v. P.R. Sriramulu and Another
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.