SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.BADHARUDEEN
K. Rema W/o K.C. Jayaprakasan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant: K.A. Jaleel
For the Respondents: Rajesh A., Rekha S.

JUDGMENT :

A. BADHARUDEEN, J.

1. The sole accused in C.C.No.09/2009 on the files of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kozhikode, is the appellant herein and she assails the conviction and sentence imposed against her in the above case, dated 31.03.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/accused as well as the learned Special Public Prosecutor. Perused the trial court records.

3. On the premise that the accused demanded and accepted Rs. 1,000 as bribe at 6.50 p.m. on 31.10.2007, the prosecution alleges the commission of offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the PC Act, 1988 hereinafter), by the accused, who was working as an Assistant Surgeon at the Government General Hospital (Beach Hospital), Kozhikode.

4. When the final report filed before the learned Special Judge, the learned Special Judge recorded evidence confined to that of PW1 to PW12, Exts.P1 to P33 as well as MO1 to MO11 on the side of the prosecution. No defence evidence was adduced. Finally, the learned Special Judge found on evidence that the accused committed offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w Sect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top