Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, K.V.JAYAKUMAR
Travancore Devaswom Board Rep. By It’s Secretary – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala Represented By Special Secretary To Government, Revenue (Devaswom) Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition details and factual background (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents' arguments and contentions (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's analysis and observations on submissions (Para 7 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. ruling on proper legal remedies available (Para 14) |
| 5. final order and conclusion on the case (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT :
Raja Vijayaraghavan V, J.
The Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB), a statutory body constituted under the provisions of the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act , 1950, has filed the present Writ Petition challenging Ext.P7 report issued by the District Survey Superintendent. The principal prayer sought in the Writ Petition is to quash Ext.P7 issued by the 3rd respondent and to issue a further direction to the said respondent to conduct a joint survey along with the Special Tahsildar, Land Conservancy Unit of the TDB. The petitioner has also sought a declaration that respondent Nos. 7 to 21 be restrained from interfering with the rights of the petitioner to perform the Arattu ritual of Chirakkal Mahadeva Temple through the access situated in Survey No. 167/9 of Parakkadavu Village.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that a
The court emphasized that when effective statutory remedies exist, invoking writ jurisdiction is unwarranted, recognizing the need for communal harmony while permitting a traditional temple processio....
Collateral materials will also have to be looked into to ascertain the genesis of the property.
Point of Law : ‘Worshipper’ is a person who shows reverence and adoration for a deity. Right to worship is a civil right, of course in an accustomed manner and subject to the practice and tradition i....
Writ court directs exhaustion of statutory revenue remedies for temple land encroachment and patta cancellation before mandamus.
Parties must include all necessary stakeholders, such as landowners, in proceedings regarding temple land to ensure legal validity and adherence to statutory mandates.
The court held that the lack of evidence and compliance with procedural requirements precludes relief under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act.
The court affirmed that a temple, having established its title through civil court decrees, is entitled to police protection to enforce its rights against unlawful eviction attempts by others.
Writ petitions concerning the administration of religious institutions must adhere to the statutory framework provided by relevant laws, rather than seeking relief through Article 226.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
