Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S.
V.Bharathan S/o. Late Ammukutty – Appellant
Versus
Palolithazhath Balaraman S/o Late Kumaran – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. partition lawsuit history and factual context (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. analysis of amendment application and inheritance rights (Para 3 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. response to appellate court's dismissal of amendment (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT :
The appellants are the legal heirs of the plaintiffs in a suit for partition. They have been non suited concurrently by the courts below, but, interestingly, the findings are divergent.
The plaint ‘A’ schedule property originally belonged to one Kandan and Sankaran jointly. Kandan had three daughters with his wife, Unniyeyi. Kandan died in the year 1925 and thereafter, his wife Unniyeyi married Sankaran and had two sons. It is pointed out that Sankaran died in the year 1944, whereas Unniyeyi died in the year 1946. The parties are governed by Makkathayam law since they are Thiyyas from Kozhikode District. The male children of Sankaran partitioned the plaint schedule property in the year 1963 and thereafter, were in absolute possession of the properties and they had dealt as though the properties were theirs. It has come out that there was an inter se partition suit between the sons of Raghavan and legal heirs of Raghavan bought certain extent of pro
Female heirs cannot inherit ancestral property if the predecessor died before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, affirming the need for existing legal frameworks in succession claims.
A voluntary partition deed conferring rights on a female heir is valid despite prior restrictions under Hindu inheritance law, emphasizing that such arrangements, once consensually made, cannot be co....
Amendment to the Hindu Succession Act grants daughters equal rights to inheritance in coparcenary properties, which necessitates modification of prior partition decrees that fail to account for such ....
The judgment clarifies that female heirs retain rights to seek partition despite Section 23, which is lifted when a male heir claims partition.
The Joint Family Abolition Act does not override amendments to the Hindu Succession Act, as clarified by the Supreme Court.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that properties derived by the father through a partition deed are to be treated as his self-acquired properties, as per Section 8 of the Hindu Suc....
Daughters have equal coparcenary rights in Hindu Undivided Family properties post-2005 amendment, but prior partitions are valid if established before the amendment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
