Back
P. S. DINESH KUMAR, C. M. POONACHA
Sumithramma – Appellant
Versus
N. Venkataraman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of inheritance and partition (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. defendants' resistance and claims against plaintiffs (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. trial court's rationale for dismissing the suit (Para 18 , 19 , 24) |
| 4. recognition of daughters as coparceners (Para 31 , 32) |
| 5. decision to allow appeal and grant shares (Para 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
P.S. Dinesh Kumar, J.
This appeal by the plaintiffs is directed against the judgment and decree dated September 09, 2011 in O.S. No. 6319/1994 passed by the I Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, dismissing the suit for partition and separate possession.
2. For the sake of convenience, parties shall be referred as per their status before the Trial Court.
3. Plaintiff's case is, one Adappa was the propostius of the family. He had three sons namely Ashwathappa, Narayanaswamappa and Hanumanthappa. After Adappa's death, the joint family properties were divided among his sons vide partition deed dated October 24, 1957. The family tree is as follows:
Witness:
1. Sd/-
2. Sd/-
Signed Before me
Sd/- A.M.Sudhakara, Village Acco
The main legal point established in the judgment is that unless prior partition is established, there shall be a presumption that the property is joint family property, and a family arrangement in th....
Previous family partition and lack of joint family status preclude the plaintiff from claiming coparcenary rights under Hindu law amendments.
Daughters have equal rights and shares in ancestral joint family properties under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.
Daughters have equal rights as coparceners in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act as amended in 2005, affecting share distribution in partition cases.
The court affirmed that ancestral property remains so despite partition, and daughters are entitled to equal shares under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended.
The court reaffirmed that daughters have equal rights as sons in ancestral properties, emphasizing the applicability of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
