SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 230

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.BADHARUDEEN, J.
Sajin Frederick @ Peter Antony S/o Frederick – Appellant
Versus
SPE/CBI EOW Chennai Inspector of Police – Respondent
Crl. Appeal Nos. 1612, 1627 of 2013
Decided On : 12-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Thomas Abraham, Aswin P. John, Clarance Miranda, Merciamma Mathew, V. Renjith Kumar, Paul Baby, Swathy A.P., Thara Elizabeth Thomas, Fousiya R.
For the Respondents: Sreelal N. Warrier, N. Warrier

Circumstantial evidence and expert testimony can establish conspiracy and individual roles in fraudulent activities, while lack of required sanction under relevant laws invalidates prosecution for certain offences.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 120B, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(2) r/w Section 13(1)(d) - Passport Act, 1967 - Section 12(1)(b) - Accused convicted of fraudulent impersonation and forgery in passport application; conspiracy established through circumstantial evidence and expert testimony. (Paras 3, 10, 30, 31)

(B) Sanction for prosecution under Section 15 of Passport Act - Lack of required sanction invalidates conviction for related offences. (Paras 10, 32)

Facts of the case:
The accused committed multiple forged activities to obtain passports under false names, producing fake documents and manipulating officials involved in the passport issuance process.

Findings of Court:
The special court found substantial evidence against both accused, confirming their roles in the conspiracy, upholding convictions except where sanction was needed under law.

Issues: Main questions were the validity of the special court's findings on conspiracy, applicability of laws regarding sanctions, and evidences of fraud.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reinforced that circumstantial evidence can suffice to prove conspiracy and individual roles while establishing that prosecution without statutory sanction under the Passport Act is void.

Result: Crl.A.No.1612/2013 dismissed; Crl.A.No.1627/2013 allowed in part, setting aside certain convictions.

Table of Content
1. allegations of forgery and conspiracy. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10)
2. proving the usage of forged documents. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. witness testimony regarding the lack of an actual peter antony. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. procedural validity of evidence collection. (Para 22 , 30)
5. final judgement confirming conviction. (Para 33)

JUDGMENT :

A. BADHARUDEEN, J.

1. Crl.A.No.1612/2013 is at the instance of the first accused in C.C. No. 16/2011 on the files of the Special Court (CBI), Thiruvananthapuram. The second accused in the above case has preferred Crl.A.No.1627/2013. The respondent in both appeals is the Central Bureau of Investigation, represented by the Special Public Prosecutor.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants/accused Nos.1 and 2 as well as the learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. Perused the relevant documents.

3. Here, the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 120B r/w 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC' for short) as well as under Section 13 (2) r/w.13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'PC Act, 1988' for short) r/w. Section 12(1)(b) of the Passport Act, 1967 by the accused persons. The following overt acts, as extracted in the trial court judgment, are the allegations against the accused/appellants:

“1) Sajin Frederick (the first accused), during the month of December, 2012, fraudulently and dishonestly submitted Passport Application to the Passport Office, Thiruvananthapuram in the name of Peter Antony by enclosing false and fabricated Ration Card, as if Peter Antony is residing at Puthuval Purayidom, 742, Koonayil, Paravoor P.O., Kollam, Kerala to prove the residential address and in order to prove the date of birth, he fraudulently and dishonestly submitted a photocopy of the fabricated extract of School Admission Register, as if, the said register was issued by the Head master, CF High School, Kottiyam, Kollam in the name of Peter Antony as his date of birth is 10.05.1976 and by making a false declaration in the Passport Application as if he is resident of the above address and the date of birth as mentioned in the fabricated records and knowing fully well produced the original of the fabricated Ration Card and School Admission Register extract for verification as genuine documents and by impersonating himself as Peter Antony fraudulently and dishonestly obtained a Passport in his impersonated name as Peter Antony bearing No.E 3882091 dated 04.03.2003 by the Passport Office, Thiruvananthapuram valid up to 03.03.2013 and he was found in possession of this passport as well as the original Passport taken in his original name as Sajin Frederick and these Passports are the property of Government of India.

2) In-pursuance of the criminal conspiracy, the second accused, knowing fully well that the first accused, Sajin Frederick is impersonating as Peter Antony and he is not residing at Puthuval, Purayidom, 742, Koonayil, Paravoor P.O., Kollam, Kerala and he never studied at CF High School, Kottiyam and in order to cheat Passport Office, Thiruvananthapuram and in order to get Passport in the name of Peter Antony by fraudulent means fabricated the Ration Card and School Admission Register extract in the name of Peter Antony and handed over the same to Sajin Frederick in order to submit the same to Passport Office, Thiruvananthapuram and further in order to get Passport by Sajin Frederick in his impersonated name as Peter Antony, knowing fully well the illegal acts committed by Sajin Frederick and in pursuance of the criminal conspiracy the second accused obtained Passport File Number from the first accused and has given the Passport File Number pertaining to Peter Antony (File No.B 049795/02) to Late Shri.Anil Kumar of M/s. Alisha Travels who in turn handed over Passport file Number to the third accused (M.R.Jayaprakash) who was working as Head constable, Di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top