Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S.
Union Bank Of India, Represented By Its Authorised Officer – Appellant
Versus
Baby John – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conclusion and dismissal of interim orders. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. overview of loan agreements and sarfaesi actions. (Para 2 , 3 , 6 , 11 , 17) |
| 3. contention of the bank against interim stay orders. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. legal standards for appeal under sarfaesi act. (Para 12 , 14 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. conditions for maintaining a writ appeal. (Para 13 , 15 , 21 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The respondent in W.P.(C)No.5937 of 2026 is before this Court in this writ appeal, invoking the provisions under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, challenging the interim orders dated 16.02.2026 and 05.03.2026 of the learned Single Judge in that writ petition. The respondents herein-petitioners filed the said writ petition, invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , seeking the following relief;
“1) Issue appropriate orders on writ petition, order or direction by ordering stay of further proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, including proceedings initiated under Section 14 , as per the order of Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvananthapuram in M.C.No.775 of 2023 against the petitioners and the properties, u
The requirement for mandatory pre-deposit under the SARFAESI Act cannot be waived; failure to comply invalidates any appeals against recovery actions.
When alternative statutory remedies are available, a writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable, particularly in financial recovery matters under the SARFAESI Act, unless exceptional circums....
The High Court ruled that parties must reveal all material facts in writ petitions and that statutory remedies available under the SARFAESI Act must be pursued before invoking writ jurisdiction.
The court emphasized the necessity of exhausting statutory remedies before invoking constitutional provisions, reaffirming that interim orders affecting financial institutions must stem from substant....
Courts should respect statutory routes for recovery before entertaining writ petitions in commercial matters, emphasizing the efficacy of specialized tribunals under SARFAESI.
Financial institutions must follow statutory procedures when dealing with MSME classification and recovery; non-compliance can render actions invalid, emphasizing the need for judicial adherence to e....
Financial institutions must follow statutory procedures when dealing with MSME classification and recovery; non-compliance can render actions invalid, emphasizing the need for judicial adherence to e....
The High Court emphasized the necessity for statutory remedies under the SARFAESI Act rather than invoking Article 226, affirming that approaches must follow prescribed legal frameworks in financial ....
A writ petition under Article 226 cannot be entertained if effective statutory remedies exist, requiring proper reasoning in interim orders issued by the court.
A writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable when an effective statutory remedy exists under the Securitisation Act, especially in recovery related matters.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
