Rajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi vs State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Chief Secretary

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(AP) 1

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, D. V. S. S. SOMAYAJULU
Rajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Chief Secretary – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sai Sanjay Suraneni, Mr. Unnam Sravan Kumar, M/s. Bharadwaj Associates, Mr. P.V.N. Kiran Kumar, Mr. Karumanchi Indraneel Babu, Mr. Sudhakar Rao Ambati, Mr. Ponnekanti Mallikarjuna Rao, Mr. G.V.R.Chowdary, Mr. D.S.N.V. Prasad Babu, Mr. Prabhunath Vasireddy, Mr. Srinivasa Rao Narra, Mrs. T. Srilakshmi, Mr. G. Ronald Raju, Mr. Kishore Babu Manne, Mr. Chalasani Ajay Kumar, Mr. K.M. Krishna Reddy, Mrs. Avanijalnuganti, Ms. Sodem Anvesha, Mr. Yelamanchili Shiva Santosh Kumar, Mr. Sunkara Rajendra Prasad, Mr. Kishore Para, Mr. Ravi Shankar Jandhyala, Mr. M. Lakshminarayana, Mrs. S. Pranati, Mr. Subba Rao Korrapati, Mr. Balaji Medamalli, Mr. Nagaraju Naguru, Mr. K.S. Murthy, Mr. Vivek Chandrasekhar, Mr. V.V. Lakshminarayana, Mr. P. Vasu Sekhar, Mr. Nalin Kumar, Mr. T.V.P. Sai Vihari, Mr. Y. Surya Prasad, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Mahfooz Nazki, Mr. Kasa Jagan Mohan Reddy, Mr. Harinath, Mr. Metta Chandrasekhar Rao, adv

ORDER :

The tussle between poor land owners who allegedly sacrificed their livelihood by surrendering their agricultural land in the Land Pooling Scheme for development of capital city and capital region with mighty Government who failed to undertake development of infrastructure, capital city, capital region, failed to handover developed reconstituted plots as agreed in Development Agreement-cum-Irrevocable General Power of Attorney in Form No.9.14, lead to filing of batch of writ petitions on different grounds.

1) As the reliefs claimed in all the writ petitions, plea of the petitioners and respondents are almost one and the same, we find that it is expedient to dispose of all these writ petitions by common order, treating W.P.No.13203 of 2020 as leading case.

2. W.P.No.13203 of 2020 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claiming the following relief(s):

To issue writ of mandamus -

a. declaring that the State of Andhra Pradesh has no legislative competence to change the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(AP) 1

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, D. V. S. S. SOMAYAJULURajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi – AppellantVersusState of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Chief Secretary – Respondent

Cases Referred (140)

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, D. V. S. S. SOMAYAJULU
Rajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Chief Secretary – Respondent