SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 354

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
Sureshkumar S/o Sukumaran Nair – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Collectorate Kenathuparambu – Respondent
W.P. (C) Nos. 11881, 12194, 12318, 12543 of 2026
Decided On : 30-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : L. Rajesh Narayan, Keerthana Sariga T.S.
For the Respondent: Ajith Viswanathan

Prior judgments bind authorities; standard objections to fireworks permissions for festivals unsustainable, allowing conditional approvals.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Relevant regulations under Explosives Act and PESO guidelines govern fireworks display permissions, requiring authorised crackers, risk assessments, and emergency plans. Petitioners applied for licences for temple festival fireworks but faced rejections citing lack of PESO-approved documents, insufficient details, time constraints for sampling, and absence of permanent magazines. Court found rejections inconsistent with prior judgments, setting aside orders and directing permissions subject to conditions. Second Paragraph: Key issue framed as whether standard objections like PESO approvals and sampling time bar festival fireworks permissions. Ratio: Prior court rulings (Exts.P10-P13) bind authorities; objections unsustainable, mandating conditional approvals with portable magazines, LE-6 compliance, barricades, quantity limits, supervision, and sample testing. Third Paragraph: Writ petitions allowed; District Collector to grant permissions post sample verification by 1/4/2026.

Table of Content
1. sample testing mandated; petitions allowed subject to verification. (Para 4 , 5)

JUDGMENT :

C. JAYACHANDRAN, J.

1. These Writ Petitions challenge Orders of a similar nature, which rejected the respective petitioners’ applications for permission for display of fireworks in connection with the respective events, which are made mention of in these Writ Petitions.

2. The reasons stated in the rejection Order are, moreover, similar, to the following effects:-

The first is that the petitioners can only use authorised crackers as approved by P.E.S.O. The second is that no risk assessment and onsite emergency plan issued by an agency approved by P.E.S.O has been produced. The third is that the petitioners have not produced the details of the fire crackers, which are intended to be used. The fourth is with respect to the scarcity of time for sampling. In W.P.(C).Nos.12543/2026 and 12318/2026, an additional objection is raised with respect to the absence of the permanent magazine.

3. Having heard learned Counsel appearing for the respective petitioners and learned Government Pleader, this Court notice that the above objections are in the teeth of the several judgments rendered by this Court in various Writ Petitions, especially, those produced at Exts.P10 to P13. The impugned Orders, issued by the same authority, therefore, cannot survive the test of law. The Orders are therefore set aside. There will be a direction to the 1st respondent/District Collector to grant permission to the respective petitioners for display of fireworks on the days scheduled, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The respective petitioners shall produce portable magazine/magazines to the satisfaction of the authorities for the storage of the fire works.

(ii) The petitioners shall satisfy all other requisite conditions for fireworks display under LE- 6 license to the satisfaction of the authorities.

(iii) Before commencement of the fireworks display, barricades shall be put up at a distance of 100 metres of the display point on all sides and no one except the persons who are performing fireworks display shall be permitted into the prohibited area of 100 metres.

(iv) The quantity of the fireworks shall be limited to 15 kilograms.

(v) The police department and other statutory authorities shall supervise the entire fireworks display and issue necessary directions, if necessary.

(vi) In case of violation of any of the conditions, it will be open to the A.D.M or other competent officials to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

4. As regards the inspection of the sample, the petitioners, in all these cases will stand directed to produce the same before the 1st respondent/ District Collector by 05.00 p.m today (30/3/2026). The District Collector will stand directed to receive the samples, and do the needful for testing/identification, so as to ascertain whether there is any objectionable material in the crackers. The above exercise shall be completed on or before 05.00 p.m on 1/4/2026. The license to be granted as per the directions of this Court will be subject to the result of testing/verification.

5. Learned Government Pleader will inform the gist of the judgment to the 1st respondent forthwith.

These Writ Petitions will stand allowed, as indicated above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top