JUDGMENT :

C. JAYACHANDRAN, J.

1. These Writ Petitions challenge Orders of a similar nature, which rejected the respective petitioners’ applications for permission for display of fireworks in connection with the respective events, which are made mention of in these Writ Petitions.

2. The reasons stated in the rejection Order are, moreover, similar, to the following effects:-

The first is that the petitioners can only use authorised crackers as approved by P.E.S.O. The second is that no risk assessment and onsite emergency plan issued by an agency approved by P.E.S.O has been produced. The third is that the petitioners have not produced the details of the fire crackers, which are intended to be used. The fourth is with respect to the scarcity of time for sampling. In W.P.(C).Nos.12543/2026 and 12318/2026, an additional objection is raised with respect to the absence of the permanent magazine.

3. Having heard learned Counsel appearing for the respective petitioners and learned Government Pleader, this Court notice that the above objections are in the teeth of the several judgments rendered b