SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 439

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
M/s. Harrisons Malayalam Limited, Represented By Its Head - Legal Sri. Sumith Babu – Petitioner 
Versus 
State of Kerala, Represented By Its Chief Secretary To Government – Respondent 
W.P.(C) No.28808 of 2021
Decided On : 12-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. E.K. Nandakumar (Sr.), Shri. M. Gopikrishnan Nambiar, Shri. K. John Mathai, Sri. Joson Manavalan, Sri. Kuryan Thomas, Shri. Paulose C. Abraham, Shri. Raja Kannan, Shri. Jayaprakash Sen (Sr.).
For the Respondent: Jayaprakash Sen(Sr), Sr.Gp- Jaffar Khan.

The court ruled that the petitioner's right to property under Article 300A is protected, and the District Collector failed to establish jurisdictional facts for declaring land as abandoned under the Kerala Escheats and Forfeitures Act, 1964.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Escheats and Forfeitures Act, 1964 - Sections 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D, 11E, and 11F - Challenge to order taking possession of land as abandoned property - Court held no jurisdictional facts established for taking property; petitioner shown legitimate interest in land - Applicable precedents discussed. (Paras 6, 9, 10)

(B) Jurisdictional Facts - Court emphasized necessity for evidence of abandonment before jurisdiction assumed by Collector - Abandonment not presumed; onus on State to prove. (Para 7)

(C) Constitutional Right - Right to property emphasized under Article 300A; dispossession only through due process. (Para 3)

Facts of the case:
A writ petition was filed to challenge the order of the District Collector taking over land under the Kerala Escheats and Forfeitures Act, 1964, claiming it was abandoned. Petitioner asserted valid ownership and tax payments, contending lack of due process and jurisdiction.

Findings of Court:
The proceedings initiated by the District Collector were found to lack jurisdictional basis, failing to prove abandonment, thus violating the petitioner's rights.

Issues: Specifically, whether the government had established sufficient grounds to classify property as abandoned and whether the petitioner had rights to the land.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that without incontrovertible evidence of abandonment, such claims to declare property abandoned under the Act were unfounded, necessitating strict adherence to jurisdictional requirements.

Result: The District Collector's order was set aside and the writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of property dispute. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's claims and legal arguments. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court’s analysis of the jurisdictional facts. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT :

VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

The above writ petition is filed to call for the records relating to the proceeding No.DCKLM/14012/ 2019-L 12, dated 03.12.2021 (Ext.P18), of the 3rd respondent, taking over an extent of 4.04 Acres of land in Re.Sy.No.15 of Block No.189 of Kollam West Village, invoking the power under the Kerala Escheats and Forfeitures Act, 1964 and to quash the same. Petitioner also seeks other consequential reliefs.

2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the writ petition are as follows:

Petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and holds properties in various parts of Kerala, which are mainly rubber and tea plantations. Petitioner is the absolute owner of 4.04 Acres of land comprised in R.Sy.No.15 (Old Sy. Nos. 7450, 7453, 7454A, 7454B & 7456) of Block No.189 of Kollam West Village. The said property, along with other properties, was purchased by M/s. Harrisons and Crosfield (UK) Ltd from one Mr.Duncan Grant Cameron, by virtue of a sale deed No.2596 of 1912 of SRO, Kollam (Ext.P14). Thereafter, M/s. Harrisons and Crosfield (UK) Ltd. was in absolute possession and enjoyment of the said property after paying the Land Tax and other statutory dues to the Government. With the coming into force of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 , M/s. Harrisons and Crosfield Ltd. filed a ceiling return as provided under Section 85A of the Kerala Land Reforms Act in respect of the properties held by the said Company, and the property which is the subject matter of this writ petition was one of the items of property included in the said ceiling return. The Taluk Land Board, Kollam, as per order dated 24.01.1979, held that the Company had an extent of 43.78.605 Acres of land as on 01.01.1970 and out of the said property, an extent of 24.90.484 Acres of land was liable to be exempted under the provisions contained in Section 81 of the . The Taluk Land Board, as per Ext.P1 proceedings, held that the Company is entitled to retain an extent of 15 Acres, which is the ceiling limit prescribed under the and the Company was directed to surrender an extent of 3.88.121 Acres of land in various survey numbers. Accordingly, the Company surrendered the excess land which was taken possession of by the Tahsildar, Kollam, on 17.11.1983, as per Ext.P2 proceedings dated 29.11.1983. Later, in the year 1979, all the assets and liabilities of the Company-M/s.Harrisons and Crosfield (UK) Ltd. was transferred to an Indian Company, Harrisons & Crosfield ( India) Limited, by virtue of a Scheme of Arrangement as approved by this Court as per Ext.P3 order in Company Petition No.24 of 1979. Later, M/s. Harrisons and Crosfield (India) Ltd., by virtue of the Scheme of Arrangement and Amalgamation approved by this Court as per Ext.P4 order, merged with M/s. Malayalam Plantations (India) Ltd. Thus, all the assets held by M/s Harrisons & Crosfield (India) Limited were transferred to M/s.Malayalam Plantations (India) Limited and Ext.P5, fresh certificate of incorporation consequent on change of name was issued by the Registrar of Companies, Kerala and the name of M/s. Malayalam Plantations (India) Ltd. was changed to M/s.Harrisons Malayalam Limited. In the year 1990, the Special Tahsildar (L.A.) No. II, Quilon issued Ext.P6 notice to the petitioner stating that the Survey Department proposes to survey the lands situated in Sy.Nos.7450, 7453 & 7454 of Kollam West Village in connection with the acquisition of the said land for public purposes. Later, Ext.P7 notification was issued by the Special Tahsildar (L.A.) proposing to acquire the subject property for the purpose of construction of an office complex at Pallithottam. In the said notice, it was specifically stated that the schedule properties were in the possession of the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top